Qatar
Overview
Qatar’s AML/CFT framework is based on Law No. 20 of 2019, amended by Decree-Law No. 19 of 2021, with implementing rules issued by the relevant sector authorities. Council of Ministers Decision No. 8 of 2026 further amended the Executive Regulation by adding Article 53 bis concerning powers and administrative functions of the head of the Qatar Financial Information Unit.
CDD rules require identification and verification of beneficial owners, with QFIU guidance describing a 20% ownership/control benchmark alongside control-based tests where applicable.
Covered entities must report suspected ML/TF transactions to QFIU under Law No. 20/2019 and sector rules. QFIU guidance operationalises STR decision-making and filing. On 7 September 2026, QFIU and the Ministry of Justice signed a mechanism governing registration and account-management procedures for Ministry-supervised entities on the Ekhtar electronic STR platform; the notice does not state a separate legal effective date.
Compliance Calendar2
Requirement
Suspicious Transaction Report (STR)
Authority / Report toQatar Financial Information Unit (QFIU)
Deadline / triggerSubmit in accordance with Law No. 20 of 2019, its Implementing Regulations and QFIU instructions; mapped sources do not impose a universal numeric day-count not directly verified from the operative instruction.
Requirement
- Subject scope
- Financial institutions and DNFBPs that are reporting entities under Qatar Law No. 20 of 2019 and implementing regulations.
- Trigger
- Suspicion of money laundering, associated predicate offences or terrorism financing.
- Filing channel
- QFIU electronic system (ESTR) for linked reporting entities. For entities supervised by the Ministry of Justice, the QFIU–MoJ mechanism signed 7 September 2026 governs registration and account-management procedures on Ekhtar, the platform dedicated to electronic STR submission; other QFIU-prescribed channels apply where relevant.
Impact
- Consequences of non-compliance
- Failure to report or tipping-off can attract sanctions under Qatar’s AML/CFT framework.
- Enforcement authority
- QFIU / competent supervisor
- Operational impact
- Maintain access to the applicable QFIU reporting channel. Ministry of Justice-supervised entities should keep Ekhtar registration, account verification, reporting-officer details and contact-point information current under the new mechanism.
Requirement
Risk-based AML/CFT controls, CDD and recordkeeping
Authority / Report toQFIU / competent sector supervisor
Deadline / triggerMaintain CDD, monitoring, governance and records for the period required by the applicable law / sector rule; No single universal retention period is shown where rules differ by record type or sector.
Requirement
- Subject scope
- Financial institutions and designated non-financial businesses/professions within the applicable national AML/CFT perimeter.
- Trigger
- Continuous while carrying on covered business; enhanced measures apply when higher-risk customers, products, transactions or relationships are identified.
- Filing channel
- Internal AML programme, customer/beneficial-owner records, transaction monitoring, escalation and retained evidence; supervisory submissions apply when separately required.
Impact
- Consequences of non-compliance
- Control or recordkeeping failures can attract supervisory, administrative or criminal consequences under the applicable AML/CFT framework.
- Enforcement authority
- QFIU / competent sector supervisor
- Operational impact
- Keep the firm’s control library mapped to the exact sector rule and keep evidence of CDD, monitoring, escalation and record retention.
Authorities & FIU4
FATF Assessment
Measures how fully the jurisdiction has implemented FATF’s technical requirements. It does not measure practical effectiveness.
Measures whether the AML/CFT system achieves its intended results in practice. Follow-up reports do not normally replace these ratings.
Explore 40 FATF RecommendationsSee every Technical Compliance rating and what it means.+
Explore 11 Immediate OutcomesSee how FATF rates whether the AML/CFT system works in practice.+
Regulatory Timeline39
Qatar issued Council of Ministers Decision No. 38 of 2026 on 15 September 2026, amending the Implementing Regulations of Law No. 20 of 2019 on combating money laundering and terrorist financing. The amendment replaces Article 59 with an updated allocation of AML/CFT monitoring and supervisory responsibilities across financial and designated non-financial sectors.
QFIU and Qatar’s Ministry of Justice signed a regulatory mechanism governing registration of Ministry-supervised entities on the Ekhtar platform for electronic suspicious transaction reporting. The mechanism defines institutional responsibilities and operational procedures for account registration and verification, reporting-officer information changes, and contact-point coordination.
Qatar published Council of Ministers Decision No. 8 of 2026 on 12 February 2026, amending the Executive Regulation of Law No. 20 of 2019 on combating money laundering and terrorist financing. The amendment adds Article 53 bis concerning powers and administrative functions of the head of the Qatar Financial Information Unit.
FATF revised Recommendation 16 to standardise payment information and strengthen fraud/error controls in cross-border payments.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗FATF amended Recommendation 1 and related interpretive material to strengthen proportionality and simplified measures under the risk-based approach.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗The QFC framework creates a regulated perimeter for permitted token services and related operators; excluded payment-substitute cryptocurrencies and stablecoins remain outside the permitted-token framework.
FATF revised Recommendations 4, 30, 31 and 38 and related interpretive material to make asset recovery a stronger operational priority, expand tools to trace and confiscate criminal property and improve domestic and international cooperation.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗At its February 2023 Plenary FATF revised Recommendation 25 and its Interpretive Note to strengthen transparency and beneficial-ownership requirements for trusts and similar legal arrangements, complementing the 2022 strengthening of Recommendation 24 for legal persons.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗FATF strengthened Recommendation 24 on beneficial ownership transparency for legal persons.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗Qatar amended provisions of Law No. 20/2019 through Decree-Law No. 19/2021, updating the national legal framework before the 2023 mutual evaluation.
FATF amended Recommendations 1 and 2 and their Interpretive Notes so countries and covered private-sector entities must identify, assess and mitigate risks of breaches, non-implementation or evasion of proliferation-related targeted financial sanctions.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗The Basel Committee revised its ML/TF risk-management guidelines to add principles for information exchange and cooperation between prudential and AML/CFT supervisors in authorisation, ongoing supervision and enforcement.
A Basel supervisory publication does not become domestic law merely because it is GLOBAL. National adoption, supervisory use or incorporation must be evidenced by a LOCAL milestone or source.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ↗FATF adopted detailed implementation requirements for virtual assets and VASPs in June 2019, including the application of wire-transfer information requirements commonly described as the Travel Rule. This operationalised the virtual-asset perimeter introduced through the 2018 Recommendation 15 revision.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗Law No. 20/2019 establishes Qatar’s core AML/CFT preventive, reporting, investigative and supervisory framework.
In October 2018 FATF revised Recommendation 15 and added the definitions of virtual asset and virtual asset service provider, formally bringing virtual-asset activity into the global AML/CFT standards architecture. Detailed implementation requirements followed in 2019.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗The Basel Committee issued Sound management of risks related to money laundering and financing of terrorism, superseding its 2001 CDD and 2004 consolidated KYC papers and integrating ML/TF risk management with prudential supervisory expectations.
A Basel supervisory publication does not become domestic law merely because it is GLOBAL. National adoption, supervisory use or incorporation must be evidenced by a LOCAL milestone or source.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ↗FATF adopted a consolidated revised set of 40 Recommendations integrating AML, CFT and proliferation-financing safeguards.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗FATF removed Qatar from its on-going global AML/CFT compliance monitoring process.
FATF identified Qatar in its on-going global AML/CFT compliance process.
Resolution 1737 imposed binding measures concerning Iran’s proliferation-sensitive nuclear activities, including an asset freeze on designated individuals and entities. Together with the DPRK regime, it forms a foundational UN counter-proliferation targeted-financial-sanctions architecture.
UN Members agree to accept and carry out Security Council decisions. This current Charter relationship is not proof of the jurisdiction’s domestic implementation, nor a claim about its membership status on the historical event date.
UN Charter · Article 25 ↗Following the DPRK nuclear test, Resolution 1718 imposed binding sanctions including an asset freeze on designated persons and entities connected to the nuclear programme. It became a central UN targeted-financial-sanctions pillar for counter-proliferation financing.
UN Members agree to accept and carry out Security Council decisions. This current Charter relationship is not proof of the jurisdiction’s domestic implementation, nor a claim about its membership status on the historical event date.
UN Charter · Article 25 ↗The Egmont Group's official Member FIU Information register records Qatar's FIU admission date as 2005-06-01.
MENAFATF records Qatar among the 14 founding member countries at the 30 November 2004 ministerial meeting.
FATF added a ninth Special Recommendation addressing cash couriers and cross-border movement of currency.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗Resolution 1540 requires all States to adopt and enforce laws and domestic controls to prevent non-State actors from acquiring or using weapons of mass destruction and related materials. It forms a binding global legal pillar of the proliferation-financing control environment later reflected in FATF CPF standards.
UN Members agree to accept and carry out Security Council decisions. This current Charter relationship is not proof of the jurisdiction’s domestic implementation, nor a claim about its membership status on the historical event date.
UN Charter · Article 25 ↗The UN General Assembly adopted the United Nations Convention against Corruption on 31 October 2003. UNCAC addresses prevention of money laundering, laundering of corruption proceeds, confiscation and a dedicated asset-recovery framework; the Convention entered into force globally on 14 December 2005.
Current UN depositary relationship to 2003 UN Convention against Corruption. This is not a claim that the jurisdiction was already a Party on the GLOBAL event date; the national accession/ratification date is a separate LOCAL/STATUS fact.
UN Treaty Collection ↗FATF comprehensively revised its AML/CFT Recommendations, strengthening preventive measures and extending coverage.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗The Basel Committee issued Customer due diligence for banks, setting minimum supervisory expectations for customer acceptance, identification, ongoing monitoring and risk management. It became an influential global banking KYC/CDD benchmark and was later reflected in FATF standards.
A Basel supervisory publication does not become domestic law merely because it is GLOBAL. National adoption, supervisory use or incorporation must be evidenced by a LOCAL milestone or source.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ↗FATF expanded its standards to terrorist financing through eight Special Recommendations.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗Resolution 1373 requires all States to prevent and suppress terrorist financing, criminalise the provision or collection of funds for terrorist acts, freeze terrorist assets without delay and prohibit making funds or financial services available to terrorists and related entities.
UN Members agree to accept and carry out Security Council decisions. This current Charter relationship is not proof of the jurisdiction’s domestic implementation, nor a claim about its membership status on the historical event date.
UN Charter · Article 25 ↗The Palermo Convention was adopted on 15 November 2000 and broadened the international money-laundering framework beyond drug proceeds through criminalisation and preventive measures tied to transnational organised crime. It entered into force globally on 29 September 2003.
Current UN depositary relationship to 2000 Palermo Convention. This is not a claim that the jurisdiction was already a Party on the GLOBAL event date; the national accession/ratification date is a separate LOCAL/STATUS fact.
UN Treaty Collection ↗The UN General Assembly adopted the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism on 9 December 1999, creating the treaty framework for criminalising terrorist financing and international cooperation. It entered into force globally on 10 April 2002.
Current UN depositary relationship to 1999 Terrorist Financing Convention. This is not a claim that the jurisdiction was already a Party on the GLOBAL event date; the national accession/ratification date is a separate LOCAL/STATUS fact.
UN Treaty Collection ↗Resolution 1267 imposed an assets freeze and other targeted sanctions in the Taliban context and created the Security Council committee that became the foundation of the UN 1267 sanctions architecture. It is a key global precursor to modern terrorist-financing targeted financial sanctions.
UN Members agree to accept and carry out Security Council decisions. This current Charter relationship is not proof of the jurisdiction’s domestic implementation, nor a claim about its membership status on the historical event date.
UN Charter · Article 25 ↗FATF revised the Forty Recommendations to reflect evolving money-laundering methods and countermeasures.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗Representatives of 13 financial intelligence units met in Brussels on 9 June 1995 and founded what became the Egmont Group. The milestone created the operational global network for FIU-to-FIU cooperation and exchange of financial intelligence.
Current profile relationship to the Egmont network. This does not imply membership in 1995; admission history is a separate LOCAL/STATUS fact.
Egmont Group · Member FIUs ↗FATF issued its original Forty Recommendations, establishing the first global AML standard framework.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗The G7 established FATF in 1989 to examine and develop measures to combat money laundering. FATF became the central global standard-setting body whose recommendations are implemented through national and regional AML/CFT frameworks.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗The Vienna Convention was adopted on 20 December 1988 and created the first treaty-level international obligation to criminalise laundering conduct linked to drug-trafficking proceeds, alongside confiscation and international-cooperation measures. It entered into force globally on 11 November 1990.
Current UN depositary relationship to 1988 Vienna Convention. This is not a claim that the jurisdiction was already a Party on the GLOBAL event date; the national accession/ratification date is a separate LOCAL/STATUS fact.
UN Treaty Collection ↗The Basel Committee published a Statement of Principles for banks aimed at reducing the risk that banking institutions would be used by criminals or as channels for money laundering. This helped establish the preventive and supervisory side of AML alongside the emerging criminal-law framework.
A Basel supervisory publication does not become domestic law merely because it is GLOBAL. National adoption, supervisory use or incorporation must be evidenced by a LOCAL milestone or source.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ↗