Global AML network view
Not publicly listed Increased monitoring Call for action Selected jurisdiction Small territory marker
100%
Select a jurisdiction on the map or list. Use zoom controls for small territories.
OCEANIA · POLYNESIA

Niue

FATF public-list status No FATF public-list status
Assessment network
Profile Changed 2026-08-16
Profile sections

Overview

Regulatory TimelineTrack FATF / FSRB and FIU-network participation alongside FATF public-list status and national regulatory activity over time.
APGRegional / assessment body
Member · since 2001-05
Egmont GroupFIU network
FIU member · since 01.05.2007
FATF public-list status & assessments
Not publicly listed · 1 assessment milestone
Local regulatory activity
6 local changes
2000201020202026
Regulatory history timeline
Bars show verified participation periods. Diamonds mark MER / FUR assessment milestones. FATF public-list bands show status history. Local markers show regulatory changes, with marker size reflecting change density.
Jurisdiction framework
AML FrameworkNational / regional framework

Niue’s national AML/CFT framework is anchored in the Financial Transactions Reporting Act 2006, as amended, together with proceeds-of-crime and related legislation. The 2024-2025 cycle materially refreshed the institutional and assessment layer without implying that the underlying statutory framework began only then.

FATF Recommendations remain the international baseline; the cited national or regional framework controls the legal obligation.
CDD & Beneficial OwnershipCustomer / entity controls

CDD/legal-person and beneficial-ownership risks are assessed within Niue’s AML/CFT framework and the 2025 APG mutual-evaluation cycle. The profile does not infer a public central BO register where current primary evidence does not establish one.

Ownership, control, verification, PEP/EDD and registry rules are jurisdiction-specific. A 25% beneficial-ownership threshold is not a universal AML rule.
Monitoring & ReportingOngoing controls and FIU reporting

The Financial Transactions Reporting Act 2006 provides the reporting-law foundation, with a Financial Intelligence Unit operating the national intelligence/reporting function. Current government evidence is used to distinguish the FIU institution from the AML/CFT supervisor role.

Monitoring, screening, periodic review, escalation and suspicious reporting should be read against the applicable supervisor and primary rule.

Compliance Calendar2

Event-driven obligations
1
Requirement Suspicious transaction reporting
Authority / Report toNiue Financial Intelligence Unit / competent reporting authority
Deadline / triggerReport within the period required by current Niue law; exact current universal numeric filing clock was not established in mapped sources.

Requirement

Subject scope
Financial institutions and other reporting entities within Niue’s AML/CFT reporting perimeter.
Trigger
The applicable legal suspicion threshold is met for money laundering, terrorist financing or related criminal activity.
Filing channel
Use the current prescribed reporting route.

Impact

Consequences of non-compliance
Non-compliance may lead to enforcement under the applicable AML/CFT framework.
Enforcement authority
Niue FIU / competent supervisor
Operational impact
Maintain rapid internal escalation and confirm the current sector-specific filing deadline and form before submission.
Ongoing obligations
1
Requirement AML/CFT record keeping
Authority / Report toNiue FIU / competent supervisor on lawful request
Deadline / triggerRetain for the period required by current Niue law; exact universal retention quantum was not established from the public current assessment page.

Requirement

Subject scope
Reporting entities within Niue’s AML/CFT perimeter.
Trigger
Creation of CDD, customer and transaction records required by the AML/CFT framework.
Filing channel
Retained internally and produced when required.

Impact

Consequences of non-compliance
Recordkeeping failures may lead to statutory or supervisory consequences.
Enforcement authority
Niue FIU / competent supervisor
Operational impact
Confirm the statutory trigger and retention period for the entity before setting automatic deletion dates.

Authorities & FIU1

FATF Assessment

FATF Compliance & Effectiveness
Technical Compliance40 FATF Recommendations
Ratings updated 2025-10

Measures how fully the jurisdiction has implemented FATF’s technical requirements. It does not measure practical effectiveness.

C1Compliant

Requirements met.

LC4Largely compliant

Only minor shortcomings.

PC24Partially compliant

Moderate shortcomings.

NC9Non-compliant

Major shortcomings.

NA2Not applicable

The requirement does not apply because of structural, legal or institutional features of the jurisdiction.

Effectiveness11 Immediate Outcomes
Ratings from MER 2025-10

Measures whether the AML/CFT system achieves its intended results in practice. Follow-up reports do not normally replace these ratings.

HE0High effectiveness

The outcome is achieved to a very large extent; only minor improvements are needed.

SE1Substantial effectiveness

The outcome is achieved to a large extent; moderate improvements are needed.

ME3Moderate effectiveness

The outcome is achieved to some extent; major improvements are needed.

LE7Low effectiveness

The outcome is not achieved, or only to a negligible extent; fundamental improvements are needed.

Explore 40 FATF RecommendationsSee every Technical Compliance rating and what it means.
C · CompliantRequirements met.
LC · Largely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
PC · Partially compliantModerate shortcomings.
NC · Non-compliantMajor shortcomings.
N/A · Not applicableThe requirement does not apply because of structural, legal or institutional features of the jurisdiction.
AML/CFT Policies and Coordination
R.1
Assessing Risks and Applying a Risk-Based Approach
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
R.2
National cooperation and coordination
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
Money Laundering and Confiscation
R.3
Money laundering offence
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
R.4
Confiscation and provisional measures
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
Terrorist Financing and Financing of Proliferation
R.5
Terrorist financing offence
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
R.6
Targeted financial sanctions related to terrorism & terrorist financing
NCNon-compliantMajor shortcomings.
R.7
Targeted financial sanctions related to proliferation
NCNon-compliantMajor shortcomings.
R.8
Non-profit organisations
NCNon-compliantMajor shortcomings.
Preventive Measures
R.9
Financial institution secrecy laws
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.10
Customer due diligence
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
R.11
Record keeping
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.12
Politically exposed persons
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
R.13
Correspondent banking
N/ANot applicableThe requirement does not apply because of structural, legal or institutional features of the jurisdiction.
R.14
Money or value transfer services
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
R.15
New technologies
NCNon-compliantMajor shortcomings.
R.16
Wire transfers
NCNon-compliantMajor shortcomings.
R.17
Reliance on third parties
N/ANot applicableThe requirement does not apply because of structural, legal or institutional features of the jurisdiction.
R.18
Internal controls and foreign branches and subsidiaries
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
R.19
Higher-risk countries
NCNon-compliantMajor shortcomings.
R.20
Reporting of suspicious transactions
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
R.21
Tipping-off and confidentiality
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.22
DNFBPs: Customer due diligence
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
R.23
DNFBPs: Other measures
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
Transparency and Beneficial Ownership of Legal Persons and Arrangements
R.24
Transparency and beneficial ownership of legal persons
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
R.25
Transparency and beneficial ownership of legal arrangements
NCNon-compliantMajor shortcomings.
Powers and Responsibilities of Competent Authorities and Other Institutional Measures
R.26
Regulation and supervision of financial institutions
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
R.27
Powers of supervisors
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
R.28
Regulation and supervision of DNFBPs
NCNon-compliantMajor shortcomings.
R.29
Financial intelligence units
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
R.30
Responsibilities of law enforcement and investigative authorities
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.31
Powers of law enforcement and investigative authorities
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
R.32
Cash couriers
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
R.33
Statistics
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
R.34
Guidance and feedback
NCNon-compliantMajor shortcomings.
R.35
Sanctions
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
International Cooperation
R.36
International instruments
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
R.37
Mutual legal assistance
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
R.38
Mutual legal assistance: freezing and confiscation
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.39
Extradition
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
R.40
Other forms of international cooperation
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
Explore 11 Immediate OutcomesSee how FATF rates whether the AML/CFT system works in practice.
HE · High effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to a very large extent; only minor improvements are needed.
SE · Substantial effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to a large extent; moderate improvements are needed.
ME · Moderate effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to some extent; major improvements are needed.
LE · Low effectivenessThe outcome is not achieved, or only to a negligible extent; fundamental improvements are needed.
IO1
Risk understanding & national coordination

Money laundering and terrorist financing risks are understood and, where appropriate, actions co-ordinated domestically to combat money laundering and the financing of terrorism and proliferation.

MEModerate effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to some extent; major improvements are needed.
IO2
International cooperation

International co-operation delivers appropriate information, financial intelligence, and evidence, and facilitates action against criminals and their assets.

SESubstantial effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to a large extent; moderate improvements are needed.
IO3
AML/CFT supervision

Supervisors appropriately supervise, monitor and regulate financial institutions, DNFBPs and VASPs for compliance with AML/CFT requirements commensurate with their risks.

LELow effectivenessThe outcome is not achieved, or only to a negligible extent; fundamental improvements are needed.
IO4
Preventive measures & suspicious reporting

Financial institutions, DNFBPs and VASPs adequately apply AML/CFT preventive measures commensurate with their risks, and report suspicious transactions.

MEModerate effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to some extent; major improvements are needed.
IO5
Beneficial ownership transparency

Legal persons and arrangements are prevented from misuse for money laundering or terrorist financing, and information on their beneficial ownership is available to competent authorities without impediments.

LELow effectivenessThe outcome is not achieved, or only to a negligible extent; fundamental improvements are needed.
IO6
Use of financial intelligence

Financial intelligence and all other relevant information are appropriately used by competent authorities for money laundering and terrorist financing investigations.

LELow effectivenessThe outcome is not achieved, or only to a negligible extent; fundamental improvements are needed.
IO7
Money laundering investigation & prosecution

Money laundering offences and activities are investigated and offenders are prosecuted and subject to effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions.

MEModerate effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to some extent; major improvements are needed.
IO8
Confiscation & asset recovery

Proceeds and instrumentalities of crime are confiscated.

LELow effectivenessThe outcome is not achieved, or only to a negligible extent; fundamental improvements are needed.
IO9
Terrorist financing investigation & prosecution

Terrorist financing offences and activities are investigated and persons who finance terrorism are prosecuted and subject to effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions.

LELow effectivenessThe outcome is not achieved, or only to a negligible extent; fundamental improvements are needed.
IO10
Terrorist financing prevention & NPO protection

Terrorists, terrorist organisations and terrorist financiers are prevented from raising, moving and using funds, and from abusing the NPO sector.

LELow effectivenessThe outcome is not achieved, or only to a negligible extent; fundamental improvements are needed.
IO11
Proliferation financing financial sanctions

Persons and entities involved in the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction are prevented from raising, moving and using funds, consistent with the relevant UNSCRs.

LELow effectivenessThe outcome is not achieved, or only to a negligible extent; fundamental improvements are needed.
Official FATF consolidated ratings · 2013 Methodology

Regulatory Timeline35

LOCAL changes 6
GLOBAL milestones 29
National history from22.06.2000
Regulatory basisSelf-governing Niue regulatory basis
Special-status regime

Niue is a self-governing state in free association with New Zealand and has its own legal system. A separate AML chronology remains to be reconstructed from Niue primary legislation.

Linked context · New Zealand association · Verified 2026-08-14
20252 events
18.06.2025
GLOBALGlobal standardPayment transparencyFATFBanking / Credit InstitutionsPayments / EMI / Money Transfer
FATF updates Standards on Recommendation 16 on Payment Transparency

FATF revised Recommendation 16 to standardise payment information and strengthen fraud/error controls in cross-border payments.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPGlobal Network via APG

Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.

FATF Global Network ↗
Published 18.06.2025 · Future-effective global standard · Country implementation is separateOpen update ↗
25.02.2025
GLOBALGlobal standardRisk-based approach / financial inclusionFATF
FATF updates Standards and consults on guidance to better promote financial inclusion

FATF amended Recommendation 1 and related interpretive material to strengthen proportionality and simplified measures under the risk-based approach.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPGlobal Network via APG

Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 25.02.2025 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
20241 event
20232 events
27.10.2023
GLOBALGlobal standardAsset recoveryFATF
FATF strengthens global asset-recovery and confiscation standards

FATF revised Recommendations 4, 30, 31 and 38 and related interpretive material to make asset recovery a stronger operational priority, expand tools to trace and confiscate criminal property and improve domestic and international cooperation.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPGlobal Network via APG

Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 27.10.2023 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
24.02.2023
GLOBALGlobal standardBeneficial ownershipFATF
FATF strengthens beneficial-ownership transparency for trusts and legal arrangements

At its February 2023 Plenary FATF revised Recommendation 25 and its Interpretive Note to strengthen transparency and beneficial-ownership requirements for trusts and similar legal arrangements, complementing the 2022 strengthening of Recommendation 24 for legal persons.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPGlobal Network via APG

Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 24.02.2023 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
20221 event
04.03.2022
GLOBALGlobal standardBeneficial ownershipFATF
FATF Recommendation 24 — beneficial ownership of legal persons

FATF strengthened Recommendation 24 on beneficial ownership transparency for legal persons.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPGlobal Network via APG

Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 04.03.2022 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
20202 events
23.10.2020
GLOBALGlobal standardPFFATF
FATF requires proliferation-financing risk assessment and mitigation

FATF amended Recommendations 1 and 2 and their Interpretive Notes so countries and covered private-sector entities must identify, assess and mitigate risks of breaches, non-implementation or evasion of proliferation-related targeted financial sanctions.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPGlobal Network via APG

Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 23.10.2020 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
02.07.2020
GLOBALSupervisory standardSupervisory cooperation
Basel Committee strengthens cooperation between prudential and AML/CFT supervisors

The Basel Committee revised its ML/TF risk-management guidelines to add principles for information exchange and cooperation between prudential and AML/CFT supervisors in authorisation, ongoing supervision and enforcement.

COUNTRY APPLICABILITYNon-binding global benchmark

A Basel supervisory publication does not become domestic law merely because it is GLOBAL. National adoption, supervisory use or incorporation must be evidenced by a LOCAL milestone or source.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ↗
Global supervisory benchmark · 02.07.2020 · Domestic adoption is separateOpen update ↗
20191 event
21.06.2019
GLOBALGlobal standardVirtual assets / Travel RuleFATF
FATF adopts the R.15 Interpretive Note and applies the Travel Rule framework to VASPs

FATF adopted detailed implementation requirements for virtual assets and VASPs in June 2019, including the application of wire-transfer information requirements commonly described as the Travel Rule. This operationalised the virtual-asset perimeter introduced through the 2018 Recommendation 15 revision.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPGlobal Network via APG

Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 21.06.2019 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
20181 event
19.10.2018
GLOBALGlobal standardVirtual assets / VASPsFATF
FATF Recommendation 15 is revised for virtual assets and VASPs

In October 2018 FATF revised Recommendation 15 and added the definitions of virtual asset and virtual asset service provider, formally bringing virtual-asset activity into the global AML/CFT standards architecture. Detailed implementation requirements followed in 2019.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPGlobal Network via APG

Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 19.10.2018 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
20141 event
15.01.2014
GLOBALSupervisory standardBank supervision
Basel Committee integrates ML/TF risk into banks’ overall risk-management framework

The Basel Committee issued Sound management of risks related to money laundering and financing of terrorism, superseding its 2001 CDD and 2004 consolidated KYC papers and integrating ML/TF risk management with prudential supervisory expectations.

COUNTRY APPLICABILITYNon-binding global benchmark

A Basel supervisory publication does not become domestic law merely because it is GLOBAL. National adoption, supervisory use or incorporation must be evidenced by a LOCAL milestone or source.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ↗
Global supervisory benchmark · 15.01.2014 · Domestic adoption is separateOpen update ↗
20121 event
16.02.2012
GLOBALGlobal standardAML/CFT/CPF standardsFATF
International Standards on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism & Proliferation

FATF adopted a consolidated revised set of 40 Recommendations integrating AML, CFT and proliferation-financing safeguards.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPGlobal Network via APG

Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 16.02.2012 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
20071 event
01.05.2007
LOCALStatus changeBanking / Credit Institutions
Niue FIU admitted to the Egmont Group

The Egmont Group's official Member FIU Information register records Niue's FIU admission date as 2007-05-01.

Relationship state from 01.05.2007Open update ↗
20063 events
23.12.2006
GLOBALUNSC · bindingPF / TFS
UN Security Council Resolution 1737 establishes Iran proliferation-related asset-freeze measures

Resolution 1737 imposed binding measures concerning Iran’s proliferation-sensitive nuclear activities, including an asset freeze on designated individuals and entities. Together with the DPRK regime, it forms a foundational UN counter-proliferation targeted-financial-sanctions architecture.

CURRENT CHARTER RELATIONSHIPNo automatic UN-member claim

This profile is not in the mapped current UN Member State set. Applicability of the Security Council measure must be established from the resolution and the profile’s international/legal status.

UN Charter · Article 25 ↗
Binding UNSC architecture · 23.12.2006 · National implementation is separateOpen update ↗
14.10.2006
GLOBALUNSC · bindingPF / TFS
UN Security Council Resolution 1718 establishes DPRK proliferation-related asset-freeze measures

Following the DPRK nuclear test, Resolution 1718 imposed binding sanctions including an asset freeze on designated persons and entities connected to the nuclear programme. It became a central UN targeted-financial-sanctions pillar for counter-proliferation financing.

CURRENT CHARTER RELATIONSHIPNo automatic UN-member claim

This profile is not in the mapped current UN Member State set. Applicability of the Security Council measure must be established from the resolution and the profile’s international/legal status.

UN Charter · Article 25 ↗
Binding UNSC architecture · 14.10.2006 · National implementation is separateOpen update ↗
20042 events
2004-10
GLOBALGlobal standardCFT / cash couriersFATF
FATF Ninth Special Recommendation

FATF added a ninth Special Recommendation addressing cash couriers and cross-border movement of currency.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPGlobal Network via APG

Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 2004-10 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
28.04.2004
GLOBALUNSC · bindingPF / WMD controls
UN Security Council Resolution 1540 creates binding global WMD-proliferation control duties

Resolution 1540 requires all States to adopt and enforce laws and domestic controls to prevent non-State actors from acquiring or using weapons of mass destruction and related materials. It forms a binding global legal pillar of the proliferation-financing control environment later reflected in FATF CPF standards.

CURRENT CHARTER RELATIONSHIPNo automatic UN-member claim

This profile is not in the mapped current UN Member State set. Applicability of the Security Council measure must be established from the resolution and the profile’s international/legal status.

UN Charter · Article 25 ↗
Binding UNSC architecture · 28.04.2004 · National implementation is separateOpen update ↗
20032 events
31.10.2003
GLOBALTreatyML / asset recovery
UNCAC adds a universal anti-corruption, laundering and asset-recovery treaty layer

The UN General Assembly adopted the United Nations Convention against Corruption on 31 October 2003. UNCAC addresses prevention of money laundering, laundering of corruption proceeds, confiscation and a dedicated asset-recovery framework; the Convention entered into force globally on 14 December 2005.

CURRENT TREATY STATUSParty

Current UN depositary relationship to 2003 UN Convention against Corruption. This is not a claim that the jurisdiction was already a Party on the GLOBAL event date; the national accession/ratification date is a separate LOCAL/STATUS fact.

UN Treaty Collection ↗
Treaty adopted 31.10.2003 · Global entry into force 14.12.2005 · Country treaty status is separateOpen update ↗
2003-06
GLOBALGlobal standardAML/CFT standardsFATF
The FATF Recommendations — 2003 revision

FATF comprehensively revised its AML/CFT Recommendations, strengthening preventive measures and extending coverage.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPGlobal Network via APG

Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 2003-06 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
20021 event
20014 events
04.10.2001
GLOBALSupervisory standardCDD / KYC
Basel Committee establishes a global customer-due-diligence benchmark for banks

The Basel Committee issued Customer due diligence for banks, setting minimum supervisory expectations for customer acceptance, identification, ongoing monitoring and risk management. It became an influential global banking KYC/CDD benchmark and was later reflected in FATF standards.

COUNTRY APPLICABILITYNon-binding global benchmark

A Basel supervisory publication does not become domestic law merely because it is GLOBAL. National adoption, supervisory use or incorporation must be evidenced by a LOCAL milestone or source.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ↗
Global supervisory benchmark · 04.10.2001 · Domestic adoption is separateOpen update ↗
2001-10
GLOBALGlobal standardCFTFATF
FATF Special Recommendations on Terrorist Financing

FATF expanded its standards to terrorist financing through eight Special Recommendations.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPGlobal Network via APG

Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 2001-10 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
28.09.2001
GLOBALUNSC · bindingCFT / TFS
UN Security Council Resolution 1373 imposes binding CFT and freezing duties on all States

Resolution 1373 requires all States to prevent and suppress terrorist financing, criminalise the provision or collection of funds for terrorist acts, freeze terrorist assets without delay and prohibit making funds or financial services available to terrorists and related entities.

CURRENT CHARTER RELATIONSHIPNo automatic UN-member claim

This profile is not in the mapped current UN Member State set. Applicability of the Security Council measure must be established from the resolution and the profile’s international/legal status.

UN Charter · Article 25 ↗
Binding UNSC architecture · 28.09.2001 · National implementation is separateOpen update ↗
20002 events
15.11.2000
GLOBALTreatyML / organised crime
Palermo Convention broadens the international money-laundering framework beyond drug trafficking

The Palermo Convention was adopted on 15 November 2000 and broadened the international money-laundering framework beyond drug proceeds through criminalisation and preventive measures tied to transnational organised crime. It entered into force globally on 29 September 2003.

CURRENT TREATY STATUSParty

Current UN depositary relationship to 2000 Palermo Convention. This is not a claim that the jurisdiction was already a Party on the GLOBAL event date; the national accession/ratification date is a separate LOCAL/STATUS fact.

UN Treaty Collection ↗
Treaty adopted 15.11.2000 · Global entry into force 29.09.2003 · Country treaty status is separateOpen update ↗
19992 events
09.12.1999
GLOBALTreatyCFT
UN Terrorist Financing Convention establishes a treaty-level CFT framework

The UN General Assembly adopted the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism on 9 December 1999, creating the treaty framework for criminalising terrorist financing and international cooperation. It entered into force globally on 10 April 2002.

CURRENT TREATY STATUSParty

Current UN depositary relationship to 1999 Terrorist Financing Convention. This is not a claim that the jurisdiction was already a Party on the GLOBAL event date; the national accession/ratification date is a separate LOCAL/STATUS fact.

UN Treaty Collection ↗
Treaty adopted 09.12.1999 · Global entry into force 10.04.2002 · Country treaty status is separateOpen update ↗
15.10.1999
GLOBALUNSC · bindingTFS
UN Security Council Resolution 1267 establishes a targeted asset-freeze regime

Resolution 1267 imposed an assets freeze and other targeted sanctions in the Taliban context and created the Security Council committee that became the foundation of the UN 1267 sanctions architecture. It is a key global precursor to modern terrorist-financing targeted financial sanctions.

CURRENT CHARTER RELATIONSHIPNo automatic UN-member claim

This profile is not in the mapped current UN Member State set. Applicability of the Security Council measure must be established from the resolution and the profile’s international/legal status.

UN Charter · Article 25 ↗
Binding UNSC architecture · 15.10.1999 · National implementation is separateOpen update ↗
19961 event
1996
GLOBALGlobal standardAML standardsFATF
The FATF Recommendations — 1996 revision

FATF revised the Forty Recommendations to reflect evolving money-laundering methods and countermeasures.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPGlobal Network via APG

Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 1996 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
19951 event
09.06.1995
GLOBALFIU cooperationFIU cooperation
Egmont Group creates the global FIU cooperation network

Representatives of 13 financial intelligence units met in Brussels on 9 June 1995 and founded what became the Egmont Group. The milestone created the operational global network for FIU-to-FIU cooperation and exchange of financial intelligence.

CURRENT EGMONT RELATIONSHIPMember FIU · Niue Financial Intelligence Unit

Current profile relationship to the Egmont network. This does not imply membership in 1995; admission history is a separate LOCAL/STATUS fact.

Egmont Group · Member FIUs ↗
Global FIU cooperation infrastructure · 09.06.1995 · FIU membership is separateOpen update ↗
19901 event
1990
GLOBALGlobal standardAML standardsFATF
The Forty Recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering

FATF issued its original Forty Recommendations, establishing the first global AML standard framework.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPGlobal Network via APG

Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 1990 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
19891 event
1989
GLOBALGlobal institutionGlobal standard-settingFATF
Financial Action Task Force is established by the G7

The G7 established FATF in 1989 to examine and develop measures to combat money laundering. FATF became the central global standard-setting body whose recommendations are implemented through national and regional AML/CFT frameworks.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPGlobal Network via APG

Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global institutional milestone · 1989 · Country membership is separateOpen update ↗
19882 events
20.12.1988
GLOBALTreatyML criminalisation
Vienna Convention creates the first treaty-level international money-laundering criminalisation baseline

The Vienna Convention was adopted on 20 December 1988 and created the first treaty-level international obligation to criminalise laundering conduct linked to drug-trafficking proceeds, alongside confiscation and international-cooperation measures. It entered into force globally on 11 November 1990.

CURRENT TREATY STATUSParty

Current UN depositary relationship to 1988 Vienna Convention. This is not a claim that the jurisdiction was already a Party on the GLOBAL event date; the national accession/ratification date is a separate LOCAL/STATUS fact.

UN Treaty Collection ↗
Treaty adopted 20.12.1988 · Global entry into force 11.11.1990 · Country treaty status is separateOpen update ↗
1988-12
GLOBALSupervisory standardBank AML / KYC
Basel Committee issues principles to prevent criminal use of banks for money laundering

The Basel Committee published a Statement of Principles for banks aimed at reducing the risk that banking institutions would be used by criminals or as channels for money laundering. This helped establish the preventive and supervisory side of AML alongside the emerging criminal-law framework.

COUNTRY APPLICABILITYNon-binding global benchmark

A Basel supervisory publication does not become domestic law merely because it is GLOBAL. National adoption, supervisory use or incorporation must be evidenced by a LOCAL milestone or source.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ↗
Global supervisory benchmark · 1988-12 · Domestic adoption is separateOpen update ↗

Sources & Verification10