Jersey
Overview
Jersey’s AML/CFT/CPF framework is anchored in the Proceeds of Crime (Jersey) Law 1999 and the Money Laundering (Jersey) Order 2008, supplemented by supervisory-body, FIU, sanctions and beneficial-ownership legislation. The September 2026 external-sanctions amendment order updates Jersey’s implementation of specified Iran sanctions changes with commencement on 29 September 2026.
Jersey’s framework combines customer/beneficial-owner identification under the Money Laundering Order with registry and disclosure obligations for legal persons and beneficial owners.
FIU Jersey receives, analyses and disseminates financial intelligence. It became operationally independent from the States of Jersey Police on 27 July 2023 while retaining its statutory designation under the Proceeds of Crime framework.
Compliance Calendar2
Requirement
Suspicious activity disclosure to the Jersey FIU
Authority / Report toJersey Financial Intelligence Unit
Deadline / triggerAs soon as practicable.
Requirement
- Subject scope
- Relevant persons/businesses and MLRO/nominated officer under Jersey’s AML/CFT regime.
- Trigger
- Knowledge or suspicion triggering a disclosure under the applicable proceeds-of-crime / terrorism framework.
- Filing channel
- Approved form / current FIU reporting procedure.
Impact
- Consequences of non-compliance
- Failure to make a required disclosure may constitute an offence and regulated businesses may face supervisory enforcement.
- Enforcement authority
- Jersey FIU / law enforcement and Jersey Financial Services Commission where applicable.
- Operational impact
- Keep the MLRO decision path sufficiently prompt to satisfy “as soon as practicable” and retain decision evidence.
Requirement
AML/CFT systems, controls, monitoring and training
Authority / Report toJersey Financial Services Commission / relevant competent authority
Deadline / triggerOngoing; maintain the prescribed systems, controls, recordkeeping and staff/MLRO arrangements. No universal periodic filing date is asserted.
Requirement
- Subject scope
- Relevant persons/businesses within the Money Laundering Order.
- Trigger
- Ongoing business activity.
- Filing channel
- Internal governance; produce during supervision as required.
Impact
- Consequences of non-compliance
- Deficiencies can lead to regulatory remediation/enforcement and, for statutory breaches, offence consequences.
- Enforcement authority
- JFSC / competent authority.
- Operational impact
- Operate AML/CFT controls as continuous governance with documented testing, training and monitoring not only calendar filings.
Authorities & FIU1
FATF Assessment
Measures how fully the jurisdiction has implemented FATF’s technical requirements. It does not measure practical effectiveness.
Measures whether the AML/CFT system achieves its intended results in practice. Follow-up reports do not normally replace these ratings.
Explore 40 FATF RecommendationsSee every Technical Compliance rating and what it means.+
Explore 11 Immediate OutcomesSee how FATF rates whether the AML/CFT system works in practice.+
Regulatory Timeline37
On 21 September 2026 Jersey’s Minister for External Relations made the Sanctions and Asset-Freezing (Implementation of External Sanctions) (Jersey) Amendment Order 2026. The order modifies Jersey’s sanctions framework to give effect to specified changes flowing from the UK’s 2026 Iran sanctions amendments, including transport-sanctions provisions and related cross-references.
The Government of Jersey approved the Money Laundering (Jersey) Amendment Order 2026 on 17 May 2026. The Order changes the reliance regime and compliance-officer framework under the MLO 2008. Compliance-officer provisions and certain definitions took effect on 30 June 2026; the reliance-regime changes take effect on 31 October 2026.
FATF revised Recommendation 16 to standardise payment information and strengthen fraud/error controls in cross-border payments.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗FATF amended Recommendation 1 and related interpretive material to strengthen proportionality and simplified measures under the risk-based approach.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗FATF revised Recommendations 4, 30, 31 and 38 and related interpretive material to make asset recovery a stronger operational priority, expand tools to trace and confiscate criminal property and improve domestic and international cooperation.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗FIU Jersey separated from the States of Jersey Police and became the Island’s dedicated operationally independent financial intelligence agency.
At its February 2023 Plenary FATF revised Recommendation 25 and its Interpretive Note to strengthen transparency and beneficial-ownership requirements for trusts and similar legal arrangements, complementing the 2022 strengthening of Recommendation 24 for legal persons.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗FATF strengthened Recommendation 24 on beneficial ownership transparency for legal persons.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗FATF amended Recommendations 1 and 2 and their Interpretive Notes so countries and covered private-sector entities must identify, assess and mitigate risks of breaches, non-implementation or evasion of proliferation-related targeted financial sanctions.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗The Basel Committee revised its ML/TF risk-management guidelines to add principles for information exchange and cooperation between prudential and AML/CFT supervisors in authorisation, ongoing supervision and enforcement.
A Basel supervisory publication does not become domestic law merely because it is GLOBAL. National adoption, supervisory use or incorporation must be evidenced by a LOCAL milestone or source.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ↗FATF adopted detailed implementation requirements for virtual assets and VASPs in June 2019, including the application of wire-transfer information requirements commonly described as the Travel Rule. This operationalised the virtual-asset perimeter introduced through the 2018 Recommendation 15 revision.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗In October 2018 FATF revised Recommendation 15 and added the definitions of virtual asset and virtual asset service provider, formally bringing virtual-asset activity into the global AML/CFT standards architecture. Detailed implementation requirements followed in 2019.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗The Basel Committee issued Sound management of risks related to money laundering and financing of terrorism, superseding its 2001 CDD and 2004 consolidated KYC papers and integrating ML/TF risk management with prudential supervisory expectations.
A Basel supervisory publication does not become domestic law merely because it is GLOBAL. National adoption, supervisory use or incorporation must be evidenced by a LOCAL milestone or source.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ↗On 10 October 2012 the Committee of Ministers adopted CM/Res(2012)6 allowing Guernsey, Jersey and the Isle of Man to participate fully in MONEYVAL evaluation processes and become subject to its procedures.
FATF adopted a consolidated revised set of 40 Recommendations integrating AML, CFT and proliferation-financing safeguards.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗Jersey designated the Financial Services Commission as a supervisory body for prescribed persons and businesses under the proceeds-of-crime framework.
The Money Laundering Order provides detailed CDD, internal-control, reporting and risk-management requirements for relevant persons.
Resolution 1737 imposed binding measures concerning Iran’s proliferation-sensitive nuclear activities, including an asset freeze on designated individuals and entities. Together with the DPRK regime, it forms a foundational UN counter-proliferation targeted-financial-sanctions architecture.
No standalone Article 25 claim is made for this profile. The parent-State, constitutional and local implementation route must be verified separately.
UN Charter · Article 25 ↗Following the DPRK nuclear test, Resolution 1718 imposed binding sanctions including an asset freeze on designated persons and entities connected to the nuclear programme. It became a central UN targeted-financial-sanctions pillar for counter-proliferation financing.
No standalone Article 25 claim is made for this profile. The parent-State, constitutional and local implementation route must be verified separately.
UN Charter · Article 25 ↗FATF added a ninth Special Recommendation addressing cash couriers and cross-border movement of currency.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗Resolution 1540 requires all States to adopt and enforce laws and domestic controls to prevent non-State actors from acquiring or using weapons of mass destruction and related materials. It forms a binding global legal pillar of the proliferation-financing control environment later reflected in FATF CPF standards.
No standalone Article 25 claim is made for this profile. The parent-State, constitutional and local implementation route must be verified separately.
UN Charter · Article 25 ↗The UN General Assembly adopted the United Nations Convention against Corruption on 31 October 2003. UNCAC addresses prevention of money laundering, laundering of corruption proceeds, confiscation and a dedicated asset-recovery framework; the Convention entered into force globally on 14 December 2005.
The UN depositary records territorial application/extension of 2003 UN Convention against Corruption to this profile. This is not independent State-Party status and carries no implication about sovereignty; domestic implementation remains a LOCAL evidence question.
UN Treaty Collection ↗FATF comprehensively revised its AML/CFT Recommendations, strengthening preventive measures and extending coverage.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗The Basel Committee issued Customer due diligence for banks, setting minimum supervisory expectations for customer acceptance, identification, ongoing monitoring and risk management. It became an influential global banking KYC/CDD benchmark and was later reflected in FATF standards.
A Basel supervisory publication does not become domestic law merely because it is GLOBAL. National adoption, supervisory use or incorporation must be evidenced by a LOCAL milestone or source.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ↗FATF expanded its standards to terrorist financing through eight Special Recommendations.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗Resolution 1373 requires all States to prevent and suppress terrorist financing, criminalise the provision or collection of funds for terrorist acts, freeze terrorist assets without delay and prohibit making funds or financial services available to terrorists and related entities.
No standalone Article 25 claim is made for this profile. The parent-State, constitutional and local implementation route must be verified separately.
UN Charter · Article 25 ↗The Palermo Convention was adopted on 15 November 2000 and broadened the international money-laundering framework beyond drug proceeds through criminalisation and preventive measures tied to transnational organised crime. It entered into force globally on 29 September 2003.
The UN depositary records territorial application/extension of 2000 Palermo Convention to this profile. This is not independent State-Party status and carries no implication about sovereignty; domestic implementation remains a LOCAL evidence question.
UN Treaty Collection ↗The UN General Assembly adopted the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism on 9 December 1999, creating the treaty framework for criminalising terrorist financing and international cooperation. It entered into force globally on 10 April 2002.
The UN depositary records territorial application/extension of 1999 Terrorist Financing Convention to this profile. This is not independent State-Party status and carries no implication about sovereignty; domestic implementation remains a LOCAL evidence question.
UN Treaty Collection ↗Resolution 1267 imposed an assets freeze and other targeted sanctions in the Taliban context and created the Security Council committee that became the foundation of the UN 1267 sanctions architecture. It is a key global precursor to modern terrorist-financing targeted financial sanctions.
No standalone Article 25 claim is made for this profile. The parent-State, constitutional and local implementation route must be verified separately.
UN Charter · Article 25 ↗The Proceeds of Crime Law established money-laundering offences, confiscation and investigative mechanisms forming the statutory core of Jersey’s AML framework.
FinCEN-sourced historical membership data records Jersey's FIU among Egmont admissions in 1998. The current Egmont roster carries a different raw admission value (1999-01-02), which is preserved separately rather than used to overwrite the historical relationship start.
FATF revised the Forty Recommendations to reflect evolving money-laundering methods and countermeasures.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗Representatives of 13 financial intelligence units met in Brussels on 9 June 1995 and founded what became the Egmont Group. The milestone created the operational global network for FIU-to-FIU cooperation and exchange of financial intelligence.
Current profile relationship to the Egmont network. This does not imply membership in 1995; admission history is a separate LOCAL/STATUS fact.
Egmont Group · Member FIUs ↗FATF issued its original Forty Recommendations, establishing the first global AML standard framework.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗The G7 established FATF in 1989 to examine and develop measures to combat money laundering. FATF became the central global standard-setting body whose recommendations are implemented through national and regional AML/CFT frameworks.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗The Vienna Convention was adopted on 20 December 1988 and created the first treaty-level international obligation to criminalise laundering conduct linked to drug-trafficking proceeds, alongside confiscation and international-cooperation measures. It entered into force globally on 11 November 1990.
The UN depositary records territorial application/extension of 1988 Vienna Convention to this profile. This is not independent State-Party status and carries no implication about sovereignty; domestic implementation remains a LOCAL evidence question.
UN Treaty Collection ↗The Basel Committee published a Statement of Principles for banks aimed at reducing the risk that banking institutions would be used by criminals or as channels for money laundering. This helped establish the preventive and supervisory side of AML alongside the emerging criminal-law framework.
A Basel supervisory publication does not become domestic law merely because it is GLOBAL. National adoption, supervisory use or incorporation must be evidenced by a LOCAL milestone or source.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ↗