Georgia
Overview
Georgia’s current AML/CFT preventive law dates from 2019 and is supported by sector regulations and supervisory rules. The legal framework applies a risk-based model across financial institutions and other covered obliged persons. Law No. 1460 (published April 2026) will bring factoring companies and platforms into AML/CFT scope under National Bank supervision only from 1 January 2027.
Beneficial-owner identification and legal-person transparency are mapped through the national AML/CFT/corporate framework and MONEYVAL follow-up evidence rather than reduced to a single registry claim.
Obliged entities perform CDD, ongoing monitoring and suspicious-transaction reporting under the 2019 law; the Financial Monitoring Service receives and analyses relevant reports.
Compliance Calendar3
Requirement
Suspicious transaction report
Authority / Report toFinancial Monitoring Service of Georgia
Deadline / triggerSubmit the report to the Service on the day the reasonable doubt is raised.
Requirement
- Subject scope
- Accountable persons under Georgia’s AML/CFT Law.
- Trigger
- Reasonable doubt is raised in relation to a transaction under Article 25.
- Filing channel
- Electronic or written form under the procedure established by the head of the Service.
Impact
- Consequences of non-compliance
- Failure to comply may trigger supervisory or statutory measures under the AML/CFT framework.
- Enforcement authority
- Financial Monitoring Service / competent supervisory body
- Operational impact
- Treat the suspicion timestamp as a same-day filing deadline and retain proof of electronic/written submission.
Requirement
AML/CFT information and record retention
Authority / Report toFinancial Monitoring Service / competent supervisory body
Deadline / triggerRetain required information/documents and reports for 5 years; the period may be extended by up to 5 additional years on request of the Service or supervisory body.
Requirement
- Subject scope
- Accountable persons under Georgia’s AML/CFT Law.
- Trigger
- Termination of a business relationship, completion of a single transaction, transaction/report creation or other retained AML/CFT evidence.
Impact
- Consequences of non-compliance
- Inadequate retention or retrievability can constitute non-compliance.
- Enforcement authority
- Financial Monitoring Service / competent supervisory body
- Operational impact
- Configure five-year minimum retention plus an extendable legal-hold mechanism for regulator/FMS requests.
Requirement
Risk-based AML/CFT controls, CDD and recordkeeping
Authority / Report toFinancial Monitoring Service / competent supervisory body
Deadline / triggerMaintain risk assessment, CDD/beneficial-owner identification, ongoing monitoring, internal controls and records for the periods required by the applicable law and sector rules.
Requirement
- Subject scope
- Accountable persons under Georgia’s AML/CFT Law.
- Trigger
- Continuous while carrying on covered business; enhanced measures apply when higher-risk customers, products, transactions or relationships are identified.
- Filing channel
- Internal AML/CFT programme, CDD/beneficial-owner files, monitoring, escalation and retained evidence; supervisory submissions apply when separately required.
Impact
- Consequences of non-compliance
- Control, CDD or recordkeeping failures can attract supervisory, administrative and/or criminal consequences under the applicable AML/CFT framework.
- Enforcement authority
- Financial Monitoring Service / competent supervisory body
- Operational impact
- Map the control library to the exact sector rule and preserve auditable evidence of CDD, beneficial ownership, monitoring, escalation, training and record retention.
Authorities & FIU1
FATF Assessment
Measures how fully the jurisdiction has implemented FATF’s technical requirements. It does not measure practical effectiveness.
Measures whether the AML/CFT system achieves its intended results in practice. Follow-up reports do not normally replace these ratings.
Explore 40 FATF RecommendationsSee every Technical Compliance rating and what it means.+
Explore 11 Immediate OutcomesSee how FATF rates whether the AML/CFT system works in practice.+
Regulatory Timeline37
The National Bank of Georgia imposed a GEL 572,118,000 monetary fine on virtual asset service provider BITEXCHANGE LLC after identifying extensive AML/CFT control failures, including customer identification and verification breaches, suspicious-transaction reporting failures, deficient sanctions and PEP screening, deficient DLT-based unusual-transaction detection and obstruction or delay during inspection.
Order No. 190/04, adopted on 5 August 2026 and published on 7 August 2026 in the Legislative Herald of Georgia, approves a schedule and enforcement procedure for AML/CFT monetary penalties applicable to National Bank-licensed securities registrars and brokerage companies and their management. The order took effect on publication. The rule addresses violations involving suspicious-transaction reporting, customer verification, beneficial ownership, sanctions screening and supervisory instructions.
Law No. 1460-Vმს-XIმპ adopted on 1 April 2026 and published through the official Legislative Herald on 6 April amends Articles 3 and 4 of Georgia’s 2019 AML/CFT law: factoring companies and factoring platforms become expressly listed obliged entities, supervised for this purpose by the National Bank of Georgia. Article 2 states the law enters into force on 1 January 2027. This is a future-effective perimeter expansion, not an obligation already in force in October 2026.
FATF revised Recommendation 16 to standardise payment information and strengthen fraud/error controls in cross-border payments.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗FATF amended Recommendation 1 and related interpretive material to strengthen proportionality and simplified measures under the risk-based approach.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗FATF revised Recommendations 4, 30, 31 and 38 and related interpretive material to make asset recovery a stronger operational priority, expand tools to trace and confiscate criminal property and improve domestic and international cooperation.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗Georgia moves VASPs into a dedicated National Bank registration and AML/CFT supervisory framework.
At its February 2023 Plenary FATF revised Recommendation 25 and its Interpretive Note to strengthen transparency and beneficial-ownership requirements for trusts and similar legal arrangements, complementing the 2022 strengthening of Recommendation 24 for legal persons.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗FATF strengthened Recommendation 24 on beneficial ownership transparency for legal persons.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗FATF amended Recommendations 1 and 2 and their Interpretive Notes so countries and covered private-sector entities must identify, assess and mitigate risks of breaches, non-implementation or evasion of proliferation-related targeted financial sanctions.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗The Basel Committee revised its ML/TF risk-management guidelines to add principles for information exchange and cooperation between prudential and AML/CFT supervisors in authorisation, ongoing supervision and enforcement.
A Basel supervisory publication does not become domestic law merely because it is GLOBAL. National adoption, supervisory use or incorporation must be evidenced by a LOCAL milestone or source.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ↗The 2019 law is the current legal foundation for risk-based preventive measures, FIU/supervisory obligations and reporting across covered sectors.
FATF adopted detailed implementation requirements for virtual assets and VASPs in June 2019, including the application of wire-transfer information requirements commonly described as the Travel Rule. This operationalised the virtual-asset perimeter introduced through the 2018 Recommendation 15 revision.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗In October 2018 FATF revised Recommendation 15 and added the definitions of virtual asset and virtual asset service provider, formally bringing virtual-asset activity into the global AML/CFT standards architecture. Detailed implementation requirements followed in 2019.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗The Basel Committee issued Sound management of risks related to money laundering and financing of terrorism, superseding its 2001 CDD and 2004 consolidated KYC papers and integrating ML/TF risk management with prudential supervisory expectations.
A Basel supervisory publication does not become domestic law merely because it is GLOBAL. National adoption, supervisory use or incorporation must be evidenced by a LOCAL milestone or source.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ↗FATF adopted a consolidated revised set of 40 Recommendations integrating AML, CFT and proliferation-financing safeguards.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗Resolution 1737 imposed binding measures concerning Iran’s proliferation-sensitive nuclear activities, including an asset freeze on designated individuals and entities. Together with the DPRK regime, it forms a foundational UN counter-proliferation targeted-financial-sanctions architecture.
UN Members agree to accept and carry out Security Council decisions. This current Charter relationship is not proof of the jurisdiction’s domestic implementation, nor a claim about its membership status on the historical event date.
UN Charter · Article 25 ↗Following the DPRK nuclear test, Resolution 1718 imposed binding sanctions including an asset freeze on designated persons and entities connected to the nuclear programme. It became a central UN targeted-financial-sanctions pillar for counter-proliferation financing.
UN Members agree to accept and carry out Security Council decisions. This current Charter relationship is not proof of the jurisdiction’s domestic implementation, nor a claim about its membership status on the historical event date.
UN Charter · Article 25 ↗FATF added a ninth Special Recommendation addressing cash couriers and cross-border movement of currency.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗The Egmont Group's official Member FIU Information register records Georgia's FIU admission date as 2004-06-23.
Resolution 1540 requires all States to adopt and enforce laws and domestic controls to prevent non-State actors from acquiring or using weapons of mass destruction and related materials. It forms a binding global legal pillar of the proliferation-financing control environment later reflected in FATF CPF standards.
UN Members agree to accept and carry out Security Council decisions. This current Charter relationship is not proof of the jurisdiction’s domestic implementation, nor a claim about its membership status on the historical event date.
UN Charter · Article 25 ↗The UN General Assembly adopted the United Nations Convention against Corruption on 31 October 2003. UNCAC addresses prevention of money laundering, laundering of corruption proceeds, confiscation and a dedicated asset-recovery framework; the Convention entered into force globally on 14 December 2005.
Current UN depositary relationship to 2003 UN Convention against Corruption. This is not a claim that the jurisdiction was already a Party on the GLOBAL event date; the national accession/ratification date is a separate LOCAL/STATUS fact.
UN Treaty Collection ↗FATF comprehensively revised its AML/CFT Recommendations, strengthening preventive measures and extending coverage.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗Georgia is listed among the 22 countries participating in MONEYVAL's first evaluation round in the March 2002 review cited by the 2007 Horizontal Review. This confirms membership/participation by March 2002 but does not establish the original admission date.
The Basel Committee issued Customer due diligence for banks, setting minimum supervisory expectations for customer acceptance, identification, ongoing monitoring and risk management. It became an influential global banking KYC/CDD benchmark and was later reflected in FATF standards.
A Basel supervisory publication does not become domestic law merely because it is GLOBAL. National adoption, supervisory use or incorporation must be evidenced by a LOCAL milestone or source.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ↗FATF expanded its standards to terrorist financing through eight Special Recommendations.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗Resolution 1373 requires all States to prevent and suppress terrorist financing, criminalise the provision or collection of funds for terrorist acts, freeze terrorist assets without delay and prohibit making funds or financial services available to terrorists and related entities.
UN Members agree to accept and carry out Security Council decisions. This current Charter relationship is not proof of the jurisdiction’s domestic implementation, nor a claim about its membership status on the historical event date.
UN Charter · Article 25 ↗The Palermo Convention was adopted on 15 November 2000 and broadened the international money-laundering framework beyond drug proceeds through criminalisation and preventive measures tied to transnational organised crime. It entered into force globally on 29 September 2003.
Current UN depositary relationship to 2000 Palermo Convention. This is not a claim that the jurisdiction was already a Party on the GLOBAL event date; the national accession/ratification date is a separate LOCAL/STATUS fact.
UN Treaty Collection ↗The UN General Assembly adopted the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism on 9 December 1999, creating the treaty framework for criminalising terrorist financing and international cooperation. It entered into force globally on 10 April 2002.
Current UN depositary relationship to 1999 Terrorist Financing Convention. This is not a claim that the jurisdiction was already a Party on the GLOBAL event date; the national accession/ratification date is a separate LOCAL/STATUS fact.
UN Treaty Collection ↗Resolution 1267 imposed an assets freeze and other targeted sanctions in the Taliban context and created the Security Council committee that became the foundation of the UN 1267 sanctions architecture. It is a key global precursor to modern terrorist-financing targeted financial sanctions.
UN Members agree to accept and carry out Security Council decisions. This current Charter relationship is not proof of the jurisdiction’s domestic implementation, nor a claim about its membership status on the historical event date.
UN Charter · Article 25 ↗The FATF Annual Report 1998–1999 explicitly lists Georgia as a PC-R-EV member since May 1999.
FATF revised the Forty Recommendations to reflect evolving money-laundering methods and countermeasures.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗Representatives of 13 financial intelligence units met in Brussels on 9 June 1995 and founded what became the Egmont Group. The milestone created the operational global network for FIU-to-FIU cooperation and exchange of financial intelligence.
Current profile relationship to the Egmont network. This does not imply membership in 1995; admission history is a separate LOCAL/STATUS fact.
Egmont Group · Member FIUs ↗FATF issued its original Forty Recommendations, establishing the first global AML standard framework.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗The G7 established FATF in 1989 to examine and develop measures to combat money laundering. FATF became the central global standard-setting body whose recommendations are implemented through national and regional AML/CFT frameworks.
Current relationship. This is regional assessment network participation, not direct FATF membership. The GLOBAL standard remains separate from evidence of domestic implementation.
FATF Global Network ↗The Vienna Convention was adopted on 20 December 1988 and created the first treaty-level international obligation to criminalise laundering conduct linked to drug-trafficking proceeds, alongside confiscation and international-cooperation measures. It entered into force globally on 11 November 1990.
Current UN depositary relationship to 1988 Vienna Convention. This is not a claim that the jurisdiction was already a Party on the GLOBAL event date; the national accession/ratification date is a separate LOCAL/STATUS fact.
UN Treaty Collection ↗The Basel Committee published a Statement of Principles for banks aimed at reducing the risk that banking institutions would be used by criminals or as channels for money laundering. This helped establish the preventive and supervisory side of AML alongside the emerging criminal-law framework.
A Basel supervisory publication does not become domestic law merely because it is GLOBAL. National adoption, supervisory use or incorporation must be evidenced by a LOCAL milestone or source.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ↗