Global AML network view
Not publicly listed Increased monitoring Call for action Selected jurisdiction Small territory marker
100%
Select a jurisdiction on the map or list. Use zoom controls for small territories.
EUROPE · SOUTHERN EUROPE

Spain

FATF public-list status No FATF public-list status
Assessment network
Profile Changed 2026-10-01
Profile sections

Overview

Regulatory TimelineTrack FATF / FSRB and FIU-network participation alongside FATF public-list status and national regulatory activity over time.
FATFGlobal standard setter
Member · since 1990
EURegional regulatory layer
Member
Member · since 01.01.1986
Egmont GroupFIU network
FIU member · since 09.06.1995
FATF public-list status & assessments
Not publicly listed · 2 assessment milestones
Local regulatory activity
12 local changes
198619902000201020202026
Regulatory history timeline
Bars show verified participation periods. Diamonds mark MER / FUR assessment milestones. FATF public-list bands show status history. Local markers show regulatory changes, with marker size reflecting change density.
Jurisdiction framework
AML FrameworkNational / regional framework
Primary AML/CFT Framework

Law 10/2010 is Spain’s core preventive AML/CFT statute and Royal Decree 304/2014 is its principal implementing regulation. Law 12/2003 and Royal Decree 413/2015 provide the targeted terrorist-financing blocking architecture. Royal Decree 813/2026 amends the Law 10/2010 implementing regulation, partially transposes AMLD6 and enters into force on 28 October 2026, subject to specific transition periods.

FATF Recommendations remain the international baseline; the cited national or regional framework controls the legal obligation.
CDD & Beneficial OwnershipCustomer / entity controls

Spain strengthened beneficial-ownership transparency through the Central Register of Beneficial Ownership created by Royal Decree 609/2023, alongside CDD beneficial-owner duties under Law 10/2010.

Ownership, control, verification, PEP/EDD and registry rules are jurisdiction-specific. A 25% beneficial-ownership threshold is not a universal AML rule.
Monitoring & ReportingOngoing controls and FIU reporting

Obliged entities must examine and report suspicious activity to SEPBLAC under Law 10/2010 and its implementing regulation, with internal-control and special-examination requirements.

Monitoring, screening, periodic review, escalation and suspicious reporting should be read against the applicable supervisor and primary rule.

Compliance Calendar6

Scheduled obligations
4
Requirement Comunicación sistemática (DMO)
Authority / Report toSepblac
Deadline / triggerMonthly · between days 1 and 15 of each month for reportable operations from the previous month. If no reportable operations occurred during a natural semester, negative declaration between days 1 and 15 of the following month.

Requirement

Subject scope
Obliged subjects and operation categories within Article 27 of Real Decreto 304/2014, subject to the explicit exemptions in Article 27.3.
Trigger
Completion of a month containing operations subject to systematic communication; a negative semiannual declaration applies where no reportable operations occurred during the natural semester.
Filing channel
Telematic submission through the DMO application. Out-of-time reporting requires the additional justification procedure described by Sepblac.

Impact

Consequences of non-compliance
Late or missing systematic reporting can lead to administrative enforcement under Law 10/2010; exact classification/quantum depends on the breach.
Enforcement authority
Sepblac / CPBCIM and competent supervisory authorities.
Operational impact
Calendar owners can compute a recurring 1–15 filing window each month for entities within the systematic-reporting perimeter.
Requirement Royal Decree 813/2026 — electronic-identification amendments become applicable
Authority / Report toInternal implementation / competent AML supervisor as applicable
Deadline / trigger8 April 2028 · eighteen months from publication, when the specified electronic-identification amendments become applicable.

Requirement

Subject scope
Obliged subjects using the electronic-identification and document-retention mechanisms affected by amended Articles 6.1(a) and 28 of the Regulation of Law 10/2010.
Trigger
Publication of Royal Decree 813/2026 in the BOE on 8 October 2026.

Impact

Consequences of non-compliance
From the applicability date, affected identity-verification and record-retention processes must operate under the amended regulatory provisions.
Enforcement authority
SEPBLAC / competent sector supervisor / CPBCIM.
Operational impact
Plan technology, onboarding and record-retention changes sufficiently ahead of 8 April 2028.
Requirement
Gaming
Royal Decree 813/2026 — gaming identity and technical-system transition
Authority / Report toInternal implementation; where the six-month player verification condition is not met, the operator must terminate the contract and communicate that fact to the Directorate-General for the Regulation of Gambling
Deadline / trigger28 April 2027 · six months from entry into force. Existing players must make the changes needed for the account-holder/payment-method identity check, and gaming operators have the same six-month period to adapt technical systems.

Requirement

Sector scope
Gaming
Subject scope
Gaming operators and players registered before the new payment-account identity-match obligation enters into force, within the scope of the amended Regulation of Law 10/2010.
Trigger
Entry into force of Royal Decree 813/2026 on 28 October 2026.
Filing channel
Implement system and customer-remediation controls; communication to the Directorate-General for the Regulation of Gambling applies in the non-compliant post-transition scenario specified by the decree.

Impact

Consequences of non-compliance
After the transition period, an operator must terminate the relevant contract if the required identity-match verification has not been achieved; other AML/CFT obligations remain applicable.
Enforcement authority
SEPBLAC / competent gambling authority within their respective remits.
Operational impact
Gaming operators should complete payment-account identity controls and technical-system changes before 28 April 2027 and establish the required post-deadline contract/notification workflow.
Requirement Royal Decree 813/2026 — qualifying small obliged subjects must notify SEPBLAC representative
Authority / Report toServicio Ejecutivo de la Comisión (SEPBLAC)
Deadline / trigger28 July 2027 · nine months from entry into force to communicate the appointment of the representative to SEPBLAC under Article 35 of the Regulation.

Requirement

Subject scope
Obliged subjects in Article 2.1(i)–(u) of Law 10/2010 that, including agents, employ fewer than 10 persons and have annual turnover or annual balance sheet not exceeding EUR 2 million.
Trigger
Entry into force of Royal Decree 813/2026 on 28 October 2026.
Filing channel
Communicate the appointment of the representative to SEPBLAC in accordance with Article 35 of the Regulation of Law 10/2010 and current SEPBLAC procedure.

Impact

Consequences of non-compliance
The decree creates a time-limited transition to bring qualifying entities into the representative-notification requirement; enforcement follows the applicable Law 10/2010 supervisory and sanctions framework.
Enforcement authority
SEPBLAC / CPBCIM and competent supervisory authorities.
Operational impact
Qualifying small obliged subjects should determine representative status early and complete the SEPBLAC notification before 28 July 2027.
Event-driven obligations
1
Requirement Comunicación por indicio (suspicious transaction / fact)
Authority / Report toSepblac
Deadline / triggerWithout delay (sin dilación).

Requirement

Subject scope
Obliged subjects under Law 10/2010 when the structured special examination under Article 17 results in indication or certainty of ML/TF connection.
Trigger
After the structured special examination identifies indication or certainty that a fact, transaction or attempted transaction is related to money laundering or terrorist financing.
Filing channel
Route depends on reporter type: credit institutions and specified centralised bodies use CTL 2.3; other obliged subjects use the current Sepblac/Banco de España electronic-register process with the prescribed F19 structure, subject to current instructions.

Impact

Consequences of non-compliance
Failure to report can constitute an administrative infringement under Law 10/2010; classification and monetary range depend on the specific infringement provision and facts.
Enforcement authority
Sepblac / CPBCIM and competent supervisory authorities.
Operational impact
Special-examination procedures should have explicit escalation ownership and service levels to avoid reporting delay once suspicion is established.
Ongoing obligations
1
Requirement Internal AML controls, risk procedures and annual training plan
Authority / Report toRelevant supervisory authority / Sepblac within its supervisory remit
Deadline / triggerOngoing internal-control framework. The implementing Regulation requires an annual AML/CFT training plan; no universal external filing date is asserted for the plan itself.

Requirement

Subject scope
Obliged subjects under Law 10/2010, subject to statutory size/scope exceptions for particular internal-control measures.
Trigger
Continuous operation and changing ML/TF risk exposure.

Impact

Consequences of non-compliance
Control failures may lead to remediation orders and administrative sanction proceedings under Law 10/2010.
Enforcement authority
Sepblac / competent sector supervisor / CPBCIM.
Operational impact
Maintain a risk-based control framework and a documented annual training plan tied to identified risks.

Authorities & FIU6

Authority / issuing bodyNational AML/CFT evidence chain
AuthorityLey 10/2010 on prevention of money laundering and terrorist financingBoletín Oficial del Estado (BOE) · LAW / REGULATIONNational AML/CFT legislation indexSEPBLAC · LAW / REGULATIONSEPBLAC legal framework and supervisory statusSEPBLAC · LAW / REGULATION
Law / regulationLey 10/2010 on prevention of money laundering and terrorist financingBoletín Oficial del Estado (BOE) · LAW / REGULATIONNational AML/CFT legislation indexSEPBLAC · LAW / REGULATIONLaw 12/2003 on prevention and blocking of terrorist financingBoletín Oficial del Estado (BOE) · LAW / REGULATIONRoyal Decree 304/2014 — Regulation implementing Law 10/2010Boletín Oficial del Estado (BOE) · LAW / REGULATIONRoyal Decree 413/2015 — terrorist-financing blocking regulationBoletín Oficial del Estado (BOE) · LAW / REGULATIONRoyal Decree-Law 7/2021 — EU directive transposition including AMLBoletín Oficial del Estado (BOE) · LAW / REGULATIONRoyal Decree 609/2023 — Central Beneficial Ownership RegisterBoletín Oficial del Estado (BOE) · LAW / REGULATION
Guidance / materialSpain National Risk Analysis 2026Spanish Treasury · ASSESSMENT / PROFILESpain · FATF country profileFinancial Action Task Force (FATF) · ASSESSMENT / PROFILESpain Follow-Up Report 2018Financial Action Task Force (FATF) · ASSESSMENT / PROFILESpain Follow-Up Assessment 2019Financial Action Task Force (FATF) · ASSESSMENT / PROFILE
UpdatesRoyal Decree 609/2023 creates the Central Beneficial Ownership Register11.07.2023 · New ruleRoyal Decree-Law 7/2021 transposes EU AML reforms and extends the virtual-asset perimeter27.04.2021 · AmendmentRoyal Decree 413/2015 develops terrorist-financing blocking measures29.05.2015 · New ruleRoyal Decree 304/2014 implements Law 10/201006.05.2014 · New ruleLaw 10/2010 consolidates Spain’s AML/CFT preventive regime29.04.2010 · New ruleLaw 12/2003 establishes prevention and blocking measures for terrorist financing21.05.2003 · New ruleLaw 19/1993 establishes Spain’s earlier preventive AML framework28.12.1993 · New rule
Authority / issuing bodySpanish State / BOE
Jurisdiction updatesRegulatory updates

FATF Assessment

FATF Compliance & Effectiveness
Technical Compliance40 FATF Recommendations
Ratings updated 2014-12 · via FUR

Measures how fully the jurisdiction has implemented FATF’s technical requirements. It does not measure practical effectiveness.

C25Compliant

Requirements met.

LC12Largely compliant

Only minor shortcomings.

PC3Partially compliant

Moderate shortcomings.

NC0Non-compliant

Major shortcomings.

NA0Not applicable

The requirement does not apply because of structural, legal or institutional features of the jurisdiction.

Effectiveness11 Immediate Outcomes
Ratings from MER 2014-12

Measures whether the AML/CFT system achieves its intended results in practice. Follow-up reports do not normally replace these ratings.

HE1High effectiveness

The outcome is achieved to a very large extent; only minor improvements are needed.

SE7Substantial effectiveness

The outcome is achieved to a large extent; moderate improvements are needed.

ME3Moderate effectiveness

The outcome is achieved to some extent; major improvements are needed.

LE0Low effectiveness

The outcome is not achieved, or only to a negligible extent; fundamental improvements are needed.

Explore 40 FATF RecommendationsSee every Technical Compliance rating and what it means.
C · CompliantRequirements met.
LC · Largely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
PC · Partially compliantModerate shortcomings.
NC · Non-compliantMajor shortcomings.
N/A · Not applicableThe requirement does not apply because of structural, legal or institutional features of the jurisdiction.
AML/CFT Policies and Coordination
R.1
Assessing Risks and Applying a Risk-Based Approach
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.2
National cooperation and coordination
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
Money Laundering and Confiscation
R.3
Money laundering offence
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.4
Confiscation and provisional measures
CCompliantRequirements met.
Terrorist Financing and Financing of Proliferation
R.5
Terrorist financing offence
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.6
Targeted financial sanctions related to terrorism & terrorist financing
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
R.7
Targeted financial sanctions related to proliferation
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
R.8
Non-profit organisations
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
Preventive Measures
R.9
Financial institution secrecy laws
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.10
Customer due diligence
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.11
Record keeping
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.12
Politically exposed persons
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.13
Correspondent banking
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.14
Money or value transfer services
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.15
New technologies
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.16
Wire transfers
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
R.17
Reliance on third parties
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.18
Internal controls and foreign branches and subsidiaries
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.19
Higher-risk countries
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.20
Reporting of suspicious transactions
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.21
Tipping-off and confidentiality
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.22
DNFBPs: Customer due diligence
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.23
DNFBPs: Other measures
CCompliantRequirements met.
Transparency and Beneficial Ownership of Legal Persons and Arrangements
R.24
Transparency and beneficial ownership of legal persons
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.25
Transparency and beneficial ownership of legal arrangements
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
Powers and Responsibilities of Competent Authorities and Other Institutional Measures
R.26
Regulation and supervision of financial institutions
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.27
Powers of supervisors
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.28
Regulation and supervision of DNFBPs
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.29
Financial intelligence units
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.30
Responsibilities of law enforcement and investigative authorities
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.31
Powers of law enforcement and investigative authorities
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.32
Cash couriers
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.33
Statistics
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.34
Guidance and feedback
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.35
Sanctions
CCompliantRequirements met.
International Cooperation
R.36
International instruments
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.37
Mutual legal assistance
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.38
Mutual legal assistance: freezing and confiscation
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.39
Extradition
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.40
Other forms of international cooperation
CCompliantRequirements met.
Explore 11 Immediate OutcomesSee how FATF rates whether the AML/CFT system works in practice.
HE · High effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to a very large extent; only minor improvements are needed.
SE · Substantial effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to a large extent; moderate improvements are needed.
ME · Moderate effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to some extent; major improvements are needed.
LE · Low effectivenessThe outcome is not achieved, or only to a negligible extent; fundamental improvements are needed.
IO1
Risk understanding & national coordination

Money laundering and terrorist financing risks are understood and, where appropriate, actions co-ordinated domestically to combat money laundering and the financing of terrorism and proliferation.

SESubstantial effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to a large extent; moderate improvements are needed.
IO2
International cooperation

International co-operation delivers appropriate information, financial intelligence, and evidence, and facilitates action against criminals and their assets.

SESubstantial effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to a large extent; moderate improvements are needed.
IO3
AML/CFT supervision

Supervisors appropriately supervise, monitor and regulate financial institutions, DNFBPs and VASPs for compliance with AML/CFT requirements commensurate with their risks.

SESubstantial effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to a large extent; moderate improvements are needed.
IO4
Preventive measures & suspicious reporting

Financial institutions, DNFBPs and VASPs adequately apply AML/CFT preventive measures commensurate with their risks, and report suspicious transactions.

MEModerate effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to some extent; major improvements are needed.
IO5
Beneficial ownership transparency

Legal persons and arrangements are prevented from misuse for money laundering or terrorist financing, and information on their beneficial ownership is available to competent authorities without impediments.

SESubstantial effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to a large extent; moderate improvements are needed.
IO6
Use of financial intelligence

Financial intelligence and all other relevant information are appropriately used by competent authorities for money laundering and terrorist financing investigations.

HEHigh effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to a very large extent; only minor improvements are needed.
IO7
Money laundering investigation & prosecution

Money laundering offences and activities are investigated and offenders are prosecuted and subject to effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions.

SESubstantial effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to a large extent; moderate improvements are needed.
IO8
Confiscation & asset recovery

Proceeds and instrumentalities of crime are confiscated.

SESubstantial effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to a large extent; moderate improvements are needed.
IO9
Terrorist financing investigation & prosecution

Terrorist financing offences and activities are investigated and persons who finance terrorism are prosecuted and subject to effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions.

SESubstantial effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to a large extent; moderate improvements are needed.
IO10
Terrorist financing prevention & NPO protection

Terrorists, terrorist organisations and terrorist financiers are prevented from raising, moving and using funds, and from abusing the NPO sector.

MEModerate effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to some extent; major improvements are needed.
IO11
Proliferation financing financial sanctions

Persons and entities involved in the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction are prevented from raising, moving and using funds, consistent with the relevant UNSCRs.

MEModerate effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to some extent; major improvements are needed.
Official FATF consolidated ratings · 2013 Methodology

Regulatory Timeline41

LOCAL changes 12
GLOBAL milestones 29
National history from1990
20262 events
08.10.2026
LOCALAmendmentBanking / Credit InstitutionsPayments / EMI / Money Transfer
Royal Decree 813/2026 amends Spain’s AML/CFT implementing regulation and partially transposes AMLD6

Spain published Royal Decree 813/2026 on 8 October 2026. Article 5 amends the Regulation implementing Law 10/2010, including formal-identification rules for business relationships and occasional transactions, mandatory identification in specified notarial, remittance/transfer and crypto-ATM operations, digital-identification/document-retention changes and gaming controls. Transitional provisions give six months for specified gaming identity/system adaptations, nine months for qualifying small obliged subjects to notify SEPBLAC of their representative, and eighteen months from publication before specified electronic-identification amendments become applicable. The decree partially transposes Directive (EU) 2024/1640.

Effective 28.10.2026Open update ↗
30.09.2026
LOCALAmendmentSpanish State / BOECrypto / VASP / CASPBanking / Credit Institutions
Royal Decree-Law 25/2026 updates Spain’s AML/CFT framework for crypto-asset service providers

Royal Decree-Law 25/2026 amends Law 10/2010 to align the AML/CFT perimeter with the EU crypto-asset framework. It expressly treats crypto-asset service providers as obliged entities, extends correspondent-relationship controls to crypto-asset services and transfers, and links serious infringements to obligations under Regulation (EU) 2023/1113.

Effective 01.10.2026Open update ↗
20252 events
18.06.2025
GLOBALGlobal standardPayment transparencyFATFBanking / Credit InstitutionsPayments / EMI / Money Transfer
FATF updates Standards on Recommendation 16 on Payment Transparency

FATF revised Recommendation 16 to standardise payment information and strengthen fraud/error controls in cross-border payments.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Published 18.06.2025 · Future-effective global standard · Country implementation is separateOpen update ↗
25.02.2025
GLOBALGlobal standardRisk-based approach / financial inclusionFATF
FATF updates Standards and consults on guidance to better promote financial inclusion

FATF amended Recommendation 1 and related interpretive material to strengthen proportionality and simplified measures under the risk-based approach.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 25.02.2025 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
20233 events
27.10.2023
GLOBALGlobal standardAsset recoveryFATF
FATF strengthens global asset-recovery and confiscation standards

FATF revised Recommendations 4, 30, 31 and 38 and related interpretive material to make asset recovery a stronger operational priority, expand tools to trace and confiscate criminal property and improve domestic and international cooperation.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 27.10.2023 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
24.02.2023
GLOBALGlobal standardBeneficial ownershipFATF
FATF strengthens beneficial-ownership transparency for trusts and legal arrangements

At its February 2023 Plenary FATF revised Recommendation 25 and its Interpretive Note to strengthen transparency and beneficial-ownership requirements for trusts and similar legal arrangements, complementing the 2022 strengthening of Recommendation 24 for legal persons.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 24.02.2023 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
20221 event
04.03.2022
GLOBALGlobal standardBeneficial ownershipFATF
FATF Recommendation 24 — beneficial ownership of legal persons

FATF strengthened Recommendation 24 on beneficial ownership transparency for legal persons.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 04.03.2022 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
20211 event
27.04.2021
LOCALAmendmentSpanish State / BOEBanking / Credit InstitutionsPayments / EMI / Money Transfer
Royal Decree-Law 7/2021 transposes EU AML reforms and extends the virtual-asset perimeter

The reform implements elements of the Fifth AML Directive and brings relevant virtual-currency exchange and custodian-wallet activity into Spain’s AML framework.

Effective 27.04.2021Open update ↗
20202 events
23.10.2020
GLOBALGlobal standardPFFATF
FATF requires proliferation-financing risk assessment and mitigation

FATF amended Recommendations 1 and 2 and their Interpretive Notes so countries and covered private-sector entities must identify, assess and mitigate risks of breaches, non-implementation or evasion of proliferation-related targeted financial sanctions.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 23.10.2020 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
02.07.2020
GLOBALSupervisory standardSupervisory cooperation
Basel Committee strengthens cooperation between prudential and AML/CFT supervisors

The Basel Committee revised its ML/TF risk-management guidelines to add principles for information exchange and cooperation between prudential and AML/CFT supervisors in authorisation, ongoing supervision and enforcement.

COUNTRY APPLICABILITYNon-binding global benchmark

A Basel supervisory publication does not become domestic law merely because it is GLOBAL. National adoption, supervisory use or incorporation must be evidenced by a LOCAL milestone or source.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ↗
Global supervisory benchmark · 02.07.2020 · Domestic adoption is separateOpen update ↗
20191 event
21.06.2019
GLOBALGlobal standardVirtual assets / Travel RuleFATF
FATF adopts the R.15 Interpretive Note and applies the Travel Rule framework to VASPs

FATF adopted detailed implementation requirements for virtual assets and VASPs in June 2019, including the application of wire-transfer information requirements commonly described as the Travel Rule. This operationalised the virtual-asset perimeter introduced through the 2018 Recommendation 15 revision.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 21.06.2019 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
20181 event
19.10.2018
GLOBALGlobal standardVirtual assets / VASPsFATF
FATF Recommendation 15 is revised for virtual assets and VASPs

In October 2018 FATF revised Recommendation 15 and added the definitions of virtual asset and virtual asset service provider, formally bringing virtual-asset activity into the global AML/CFT standards architecture. Detailed implementation requirements followed in 2019.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 19.10.2018 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
20151 event
20142 events
15.01.2014
GLOBALSupervisory standardBank supervision
Basel Committee integrates ML/TF risk into banks’ overall risk-management framework

The Basel Committee issued Sound management of risks related to money laundering and financing of terrorism, superseding its 2001 CDD and 2004 consolidated KYC papers and integrating ML/TF risk management with prudential supervisory expectations.

COUNTRY APPLICABILITYNon-binding global benchmark

A Basel supervisory publication does not become domestic law merely because it is GLOBAL. National adoption, supervisory use or incorporation must be evidenced by a LOCAL milestone or source.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ↗
Global supervisory benchmark · 15.01.2014 · Domestic adoption is separateOpen update ↗
20121 event
16.02.2012
GLOBALGlobal standardAML/CFT/CPF standardsFATF
International Standards on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism & Proliferation

FATF adopted a consolidated revised set of 40 Recommendations integrating AML, CFT and proliferation-financing safeguards.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 16.02.2012 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
20101 event
20062 events
23.12.2006
GLOBALUNSC · bindingPF / TFS
UN Security Council Resolution 1737 establishes Iran proliferation-related asset-freeze measures

Resolution 1737 imposed binding measures concerning Iran’s proliferation-sensitive nuclear activities, including an asset freeze on designated individuals and entities. Together with the DPRK regime, it forms a foundational UN counter-proliferation targeted-financial-sanctions architecture.

CURRENT CHARTER RELATIONSHIPUN Member State · Article 25 obligation

UN Members agree to accept and carry out Security Council decisions. This current Charter relationship is not proof of the jurisdiction’s domestic implementation, nor a claim about its membership status on the historical event date.

UN Charter · Article 25 ↗
Binding UNSC architecture · 23.12.2006 · National implementation is separateOpen update ↗
14.10.2006
GLOBALUNSC · bindingPF / TFS
UN Security Council Resolution 1718 establishes DPRK proliferation-related asset-freeze measures

Following the DPRK nuclear test, Resolution 1718 imposed binding sanctions including an asset freeze on designated persons and entities connected to the nuclear programme. It became a central UN targeted-financial-sanctions pillar for counter-proliferation financing.

CURRENT CHARTER RELATIONSHIPUN Member State · Article 25 obligation

UN Members agree to accept and carry out Security Council decisions. This current Charter relationship is not proof of the jurisdiction’s domestic implementation, nor a claim about its membership status on the historical event date.

UN Charter · Article 25 ↗
Binding UNSC architecture · 14.10.2006 · National implementation is separateOpen update ↗
20042 events
2004-10
GLOBALGlobal standardCFT / cash couriersFATF
FATF Ninth Special Recommendation

FATF added a ninth Special Recommendation addressing cash couriers and cross-border movement of currency.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 2004-10 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
28.04.2004
GLOBALUNSC · bindingPF / WMD controls
UN Security Council Resolution 1540 creates binding global WMD-proliferation control duties

Resolution 1540 requires all States to adopt and enforce laws and domestic controls to prevent non-State actors from acquiring or using weapons of mass destruction and related materials. It forms a binding global legal pillar of the proliferation-financing control environment later reflected in FATF CPF standards.

CURRENT CHARTER RELATIONSHIPUN Member State · Article 25 obligation

UN Members agree to accept and carry out Security Council decisions. This current Charter relationship is not proof of the jurisdiction’s domestic implementation, nor a claim about its membership status on the historical event date.

UN Charter · Article 25 ↗
Binding UNSC architecture · 28.04.2004 · National implementation is separateOpen update ↗
20033 events
31.10.2003
GLOBALTreatyML / asset recovery
UNCAC adds a universal anti-corruption, laundering and asset-recovery treaty layer

The UN General Assembly adopted the United Nations Convention against Corruption on 31 October 2003. UNCAC addresses prevention of money laundering, laundering of corruption proceeds, confiscation and a dedicated asset-recovery framework; the Convention entered into force globally on 14 December 2005.

CURRENT TREATY STATUSParty

Current UN depositary relationship to 2003 UN Convention against Corruption. This is not a claim that the jurisdiction was already a Party on the GLOBAL event date; the national accession/ratification date is a separate LOCAL/STATUS fact.

UN Treaty Collection ↗
Treaty adopted 31.10.2003 · Global entry into force 14.12.2005 · Country treaty status is separateOpen update ↗
2003-06
GLOBALGlobal standardAML/CFT standardsFATF
The FATF Recommendations — 2003 revision

FATF comprehensively revised its AML/CFT Recommendations, strengthening preventive measures and extending coverage.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 2003-06 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
20013 events
04.10.2001
GLOBALSupervisory standardCDD / KYC
Basel Committee establishes a global customer-due-diligence benchmark for banks

The Basel Committee issued Customer due diligence for banks, setting minimum supervisory expectations for customer acceptance, identification, ongoing monitoring and risk management. It became an influential global banking KYC/CDD benchmark and was later reflected in FATF standards.

COUNTRY APPLICABILITYNon-binding global benchmark

A Basel supervisory publication does not become domestic law merely because it is GLOBAL. National adoption, supervisory use or incorporation must be evidenced by a LOCAL milestone or source.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ↗
Global supervisory benchmark · 04.10.2001 · Domestic adoption is separateOpen update ↗
2001-10
GLOBALGlobal standardCFTFATF
FATF Special Recommendations on Terrorist Financing

FATF expanded its standards to terrorist financing through eight Special Recommendations.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 2001-10 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
28.09.2001
GLOBALUNSC · bindingCFT / TFS
UN Security Council Resolution 1373 imposes binding CFT and freezing duties on all States

Resolution 1373 requires all States to prevent and suppress terrorist financing, criminalise the provision or collection of funds for terrorist acts, freeze terrorist assets without delay and prohibit making funds or financial services available to terrorists and related entities.

CURRENT CHARTER RELATIONSHIPUN Member State · Article 25 obligation

UN Members agree to accept and carry out Security Council decisions. This current Charter relationship is not proof of the jurisdiction’s domestic implementation, nor a claim about its membership status on the historical event date.

UN Charter · Article 25 ↗
Binding UNSC architecture · 28.09.2001 · National implementation is separateOpen update ↗
20001 event
15.11.2000
GLOBALTreatyML / organised crime
Palermo Convention broadens the international money-laundering framework beyond drug trafficking

The Palermo Convention was adopted on 15 November 2000 and broadened the international money-laundering framework beyond drug proceeds through criminalisation and preventive measures tied to transnational organised crime. It entered into force globally on 29 September 2003.

CURRENT TREATY STATUSParty

Current UN depositary relationship to 2000 Palermo Convention. This is not a claim that the jurisdiction was already a Party on the GLOBAL event date; the national accession/ratification date is a separate LOCAL/STATUS fact.

UN Treaty Collection ↗
Treaty adopted 15.11.2000 · Global entry into force 29.09.2003 · Country treaty status is separateOpen update ↗
19992 events
09.12.1999
GLOBALTreatyCFT
UN Terrorist Financing Convention establishes a treaty-level CFT framework

The UN General Assembly adopted the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism on 9 December 1999, creating the treaty framework for criminalising terrorist financing and international cooperation. It entered into force globally on 10 April 2002.

CURRENT TREATY STATUSParty

Current UN depositary relationship to 1999 Terrorist Financing Convention. This is not a claim that the jurisdiction was already a Party on the GLOBAL event date; the national accession/ratification date is a separate LOCAL/STATUS fact.

UN Treaty Collection ↗
Treaty adopted 09.12.1999 · Global entry into force 10.04.2002 · Country treaty status is separateOpen update ↗
15.10.1999
GLOBALUNSC · bindingTFS
UN Security Council Resolution 1267 establishes a targeted asset-freeze regime

Resolution 1267 imposed an assets freeze and other targeted sanctions in the Taliban context and created the Security Council committee that became the foundation of the UN 1267 sanctions architecture. It is a key global precursor to modern terrorist-financing targeted financial sanctions.

CURRENT CHARTER RELATIONSHIPUN Member State · Article 25 obligation

UN Members agree to accept and carry out Security Council decisions. This current Charter relationship is not proof of the jurisdiction’s domestic implementation, nor a claim about its membership status on the historical event date.

UN Charter · Article 25 ↗
Binding UNSC architecture · 15.10.1999 · National implementation is separateOpen update ↗
19961 event
1996
GLOBALGlobal standardAML standardsFATF
The FATF Recommendations — 1996 revision

FATF revised the Forty Recommendations to reflect evolving money-laundering methods and countermeasures.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 1996 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
19953 events
07.07.1995
LOCALNew rule
Royal Decree 925/1995 operationalises Spain’s preventive AML and reporting architecture

Royal Decree 925/1995 developed Law 19/1993, constituted the Commission’s support structure and detailed reporting obligations and procedures. Published on 6 July 1995, it entered into force the following day and anchored the Servicio Ejecutivo operationally within the framework.

Effective 07.07.1995Open update ↗
09.06.1995
GLOBALFIU cooperationFIU cooperation
Egmont Group creates the global FIU cooperation network

Representatives of 13 financial intelligence units met in Brussels on 9 June 1995 and founded what became the Egmont Group. The milestone created the operational global network for FIU-to-FIU cooperation and exchange of financial intelligence.

CURRENT EGMONT RELATIONSHIPMember FIU · SEPBLAC

Current profile relationship to the Egmont network. This does not imply membership in 1995; admission history is a separate LOCAL/STATUS fact.

Egmont Group · Member FIUs ↗
Global FIU cooperation infrastructure · 09.06.1995 · FIU membership is separateOpen update ↗
09.06.1995
LOCALStatus changeBanking / Credit Institutions
Spain FIU becomes a founding member of the Egmont Group

Historical FinCEN/GAO membership evidence identifies Spain among the 14 first Egmont Group members; Egmont's official history dates the founding meeting to 9 June 1995.

Relationship state from 09.06.1995Open update ↗
19931 event
28.12.1993
LOCALNew ruleSpanish State / BOEBanking / Credit Institutions
Law 19/1993 establishes Spain’s earlier preventive AML framework

Law 19/1993 established Spain’s preventive AML framework and created the Commission for the Prevention of Money Laundering and Monetary Offences together with its Servicio Ejecutivo. The law therefore marks both a preventive-law milestone and the statutory origin of the national financial-intelligence architecture.

Effective 28.12.1993Open update ↗
19902 events
1990
GLOBALGlobal standardAML standardsFATF
The Forty Recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering

FATF issued its original Forty Recommendations, establishing the first global AML standard framework.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 1990 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
19891 event
1989
GLOBALGlobal institutionGlobal standard-settingFATF
Financial Action Task Force is established by the G7

The G7 established FATF in 1989 to examine and develop measures to combat money laundering. FATF became the central global standard-setting body whose recommendations are implemented through national and regional AML/CFT frameworks.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global institutional milestone · 1989 · Country membership is separateOpen update ↗
19882 events
20.12.1988
GLOBALTreatyML criminalisation
Vienna Convention creates the first treaty-level international money-laundering criminalisation baseline

The Vienna Convention was adopted on 20 December 1988 and created the first treaty-level international obligation to criminalise laundering conduct linked to drug-trafficking proceeds, alongside confiscation and international-cooperation measures. It entered into force globally on 11 November 1990.

CURRENT TREATY STATUSParty

Current UN depositary relationship to 1988 Vienna Convention. This is not a claim that the jurisdiction was already a Party on the GLOBAL event date; the national accession/ratification date is a separate LOCAL/STATUS fact.

UN Treaty Collection ↗
Treaty adopted 20.12.1988 · Global entry into force 11.11.1990 · Country treaty status is separateOpen update ↗
1988-12
GLOBALSupervisory standardBank AML / KYC
Basel Committee issues principles to prevent criminal use of banks for money laundering

The Basel Committee published a Statement of Principles for banks aimed at reducing the risk that banking institutions would be used by criminals or as channels for money laundering. This helped establish the preventive and supervisory side of AML alongside the emerging criminal-law framework.

COUNTRY APPLICABILITYNon-binding global benchmark

A Basel supervisory publication does not become domestic law merely because it is GLOBAL. National adoption, supervisory use or incorporation must be evidenced by a LOCAL milestone or source.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ↗
Global supervisory benchmark · 1988-12 · Domestic adoption is separateOpen update ↗

Sources & Verification21

Spain National Risk Analysis 2026Spanish Treasury · ASSESSMENT / PROFILERoyal Decree 609/2023 — Central Beneficial Ownership RegisterBoletín Oficial del Estado (BOE) · LAW / REGULATIONRoyal Decree-Law 7/2021 — EU directive transposition including AMLBoletín Oficial del Estado (BOE) · LAW / REGULATIONSpain Follow-Up Assessment 2019Financial Action Task Force (FATF) · ASSESSMENT / PROFILESpain Follow-Up Report 2018Financial Action Task Force (FATF) · ASSESSMENT / PROFILERoyal Decree 413/2015 — terrorist-financing blocking regulationBoletín Oficial del Estado (BOE) · LAW / REGULATIONRoyal Decree 304/2014 — Regulation implementing Law 10/2010Boletín Oficial del Estado (BOE) · LAW / REGULATIONSpain · FATF country profileFinancial Action Task Force (FATF) · ASSESSMENT / PROFILELey 10/2010 on prevention of money laundering and terrorist financingBoletín Oficial del Estado (BOE) · LAW / REGULATIONNational AML/CFT legislation indexSEPBLAC · LAW / REGULATIONSEPBLAC legal framework and supervisory statusSEPBLAC · LAW / REGULATIONLaw 12/2003 on prevention and blocking of terrorist financingBoletín Oficial del Estado (BOE) · LAW / REGULATIONReal Decreto 813/2026, de 7 de octubre — financial-sector regulatory amendments including the Regulation of Law 10/2010Boletín Oficial del Estado (BOE) · LAW / REGULATIONFATF RecommendationsFinancial Action Task Force (FATF) · OFFICIAL SOURCEFATF Countries & Global NetworkFinancial Action Task Force (FATF) · OFFICIAL SOURCEEgmont Group Member FIU InformationEgmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units · INSTITUTIONAL / REFERENCEFATF consolidated assessment ratingsTechnical Compliance & Effectiveness · 2013 MethodologyMutual Evaluation Report · 2014-12Official FATF / regional assessmentSepblac · Comunicación por indicioSEPBLAC · INSTITUTIONAL / REFERENCESepblac · Comunicación sistemáticaSEPBLAC · INSTITUTIONAL / REFERENCESepblac · DMO FAQSEPBLAC · GUIDANCE