Global AML network view
Not publicly listed Increased monitoring Call for action Selected jurisdiction Small territory marker
100%
Select a jurisdiction on the map or list. Use zoom controls for small territories.
AMERICAS · NORTHERN AMERICA

Canada

FATF public-list status No FATF public-list status
Assessment network
Profile Changed 2026-10-01
Profile sections

Overview

Regulatory TimelineTrack FATF / FSRB and FIU-network participation alongside FATF public-list status and national regulatory activity over time.
FATFGlobal standard setter
Member · since 1990
APGRegional / assessment body
Member · since 2006-07
Egmont GroupFIU network
FIU member · since 07.06.2002
FATF public-list status & assessments
Not publicly listed · 3 assessment milestones
Local regulatory activity
15 local changes
19892000201020202026
Regulatory history timeline
Bars show verified participation periods. Diamonds mark MER / FUR assessment milestones. FATF public-list bands show status history. Local markers show regulatory changes, with marker size reflecting change density.
Jurisdiction framework
AML FrameworkNational / regional framework

Canada’s federal AML/ATF framework is based on the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act and regulations, with major modernisation in 2021 and subsequent beneficial-ownership, sanctions-evasion and risk-framework reforms.

FATF Recommendations remain the international baseline; the cited national or regional framework controls the legal obligation.
CDD & Beneficial OwnershipCustomer / entity controls

Reporting entities must obtain and confirm beneficial-ownership information under FINTRAC rules. A public federal CBCA beneficial-ownership registry launched in January 2024, and specified discrepancy-reporting obligations became effective 1 October 2025.

Ownership, control, verification, PEP/EDD and registry rules are jurisdiction-specific. A 25% beneficial-ownership threshold is not a universal AML rule.
Monitoring & ReportingOngoing controls and FIU reporting

FINTRAC receives suspicious transaction reports and other prescribed reports. Since August 2024, suspected sanctions evasion is explicitly integrated into relevant suspicious transaction reporting obligations.

Monitoring, screening, periodic review, escalation and suspicious reporting should be read against the applicable supervisor and primary rule.

Compliance Calendar5

Event-driven obligations
4
Requirement
Banking / Credit InstitutionsPayments / EMI / Money Transfer
International Electronic Funds Transfer Report (EFTR)
Authority / Report toFINTRAC
Deadline / triggerWithin 5 business days after the day the transfer is initiated or finally received, as applicable.

Requirement

Sector scope
Banking / Credit InstitutionsPayments / EMI / Money Transfer
Subject scope
Reporting entities subject to international EFT reporting.
Trigger
Initiating or finally receiving a reportable international EFT of C$10,000 or more, including applicable aggregation.
Filing channel
FINTRAC Web Reporting / API.

Impact

Consequences of non-compliance
Failure to report within the prescribed timing can be an AMP violation.
Enforcement authority
FINTRAC
Operational impact
Record the initiation/final-receipt event used to start the deadline.
Requirement
Banking / Credit InstitutionsPayments / EMI / Money TransferGambling / iGaming
Large Cash Transaction Report (LCTR)
Authority / Report toFINTRAC
Deadline / triggerWithin 15 calendar days after the day the cash is received.

Requirement

Sector scope
Banking / Credit InstitutionsPayments / EMI / Money TransferGambling / iGaming
Subject scope
FINTRAC reporting entities receiving reportable cash.
Trigger
Receipt of C$10,000 or more in cash, including applicable 24-hour aggregation.
Filing channel
FINTRAC Web Reporting / API.

Impact

Consequences of non-compliance
Late or omitted prescribed reports can attract administrative monetary penalties.
Enforcement authority
FINTRAC
Operational impact
Preserve receipt date and aggregation relationships for deadline calculation.
Requirement
Payments / EMI / Money Transfer
Large Virtual Currency Transaction Report (LVCTR)
Authority / Report toFINTRAC
Deadline / triggerWithin 5 working days after the day the amount is received.

Requirement

Sector scope
Payments / EMI / Money Transfer
Subject scope
Reporting entities receiving virtual currency within the LVCTR rules.
Trigger
Receipt of C$10,000 or more in virtual currency, including applicable aggregation.
Filing channel
FINTRAC reporting systems / API.

Impact

Consequences of non-compliance
Failure to file may attract FINTRAC administrative monetary penalties.
Enforcement authority
FINTRAC
Operational impact
Calculate the working-day clock separately from cash-report timing.
Requirement Suspicious Transaction Report (STR)
Authority / Report toFINTRAC
Deadline / triggerAs soon as practicable.

Requirement

Subject scope
FINTRAC reporting entities when reasonable grounds to suspect are established.
Trigger
Completion of measures enabling reasonable grounds to suspect ML/TF linkage.
Filing channel
FINTRAC Web Reporting / supported API.

Impact

Consequences of non-compliance
Failure to report can lead to administrative monetary penalties or criminal enforcement depending on the violation.
Enforcement authority
FINTRAC / law enforcement where applicable
Operational impact
Give STR completion priority once the statutory suspicion threshold is reached.
Ongoing obligations
1
Requirement Compliance program, risk assessment and ongoing monitoring
Authority / Report toFINTRAC
Deadline / triggerOngoing; program, risk assessment, policies/procedures, training and effectiveness review requirements apply continuously or at prescribed intervals.

Requirement

Subject scope
FINTRAC reporting entities, with sector-specific application.
Trigger
While carrying on activities that make the person/entity a reporting entity.

Impact

Consequences of non-compliance
Deficiencies can result in findings, compliance actions and administrative monetary penalties.
Enforcement authority
FINTRAC
Operational impact
Maintain periodic review tasks and evidence for monitoring, training and risk-assessment updates.

Authorities & FIU7

Authority / issuing bodyFINTRAC

FATF Assessment

FATF Compliance & Effectiveness
Technical Compliance40 FATF Recommendations
Ratings updated 2021-09 · via FUR

Measures how fully the jurisdiction has implemented FATF’s technical requirements. It does not measure practical effectiveness.

C11Compliant

Requirements met.

LC23Largely compliant

Only minor shortcomings.

PC5Partially compliant

Moderate shortcomings.

NC1Non-compliant

Major shortcomings.

NA0Not applicable

The requirement does not apply because of structural, legal or institutional features of the jurisdiction.

Effectiveness11 Immediate Outcomes
Ratings from MER 2016-09

Measures whether the AML/CFT system achieves its intended results in practice. Follow-up reports do not normally replace these ratings.

HE0High effectiveness

The outcome is achieved to a very large extent; only minor improvements are needed.

SE5Substantial effectiveness

The outcome is achieved to a large extent; moderate improvements are needed.

ME5Moderate effectiveness

The outcome is achieved to some extent; major improvements are needed.

LE1Low effectiveness

The outcome is not achieved, or only to a negligible extent; fundamental improvements are needed.

Explore 40 FATF RecommendationsSee every Technical Compliance rating and what it means.
C · CompliantRequirements met.
LC · Largely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
PC · Partially compliantModerate shortcomings.
NC · Non-compliantMajor shortcomings.
N/A · Not applicableThe requirement does not apply because of structural, legal or institutional features of the jurisdiction.
AML/CFT Policies and Coordination
R.1
Assessing Risks and Applying a Risk-Based Approach
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.2
National cooperation and coordination
CCompliantRequirements met.
Money Laundering and Confiscation
R.3
Money laundering offence
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.4
Confiscation and provisional measures
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
Terrorist Financing and Financing of Proliferation
R.5
Terrorist financing offence
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.6
Targeted financial sanctions related to terrorism & terrorist financing
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.7
Targeted financial sanctions related to proliferation
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.8
Non-profit organisations
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
Preventive Measures
R.9
Financial institution secrecy laws
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.10
Customer due diligence
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.11
Record keeping
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.12
Politically exposed persons
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.13
Correspondent banking
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.14
Money or value transfer services
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.15
New technologies
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.16
Wire transfers
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.17
Reliance on third parties
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.18
Internal controls and foreign branches and subsidiaries
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.19
Higher-risk countries
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.20
Reporting of suspicious transactions
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.21
Tipping-off and confidentiality
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.22
DNFBPs: Customer due diligence
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
R.23
DNFBPs: Other measures
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
Transparency and Beneficial Ownership of Legal Persons and Arrangements
R.24
Transparency and beneficial ownership of legal persons
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
R.25
Transparency and beneficial ownership of legal arrangements
NCNon-compliantMajor shortcomings.
Powers and Responsibilities of Competent Authorities and Other Institutional Measures
R.26
Regulation and supervision of financial institutions
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.27
Powers of supervisors
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.28
Regulation and supervision of DNFBPs
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
R.29
Financial intelligence units
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
R.30
Responsibilities of law enforcement and investigative authorities
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.31
Powers of law enforcement and investigative authorities
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.32
Cash couriers
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.33
Statistics
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.34
Guidance and feedback
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.35
Sanctions
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
International Cooperation
R.36
International instruments
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.37
Mutual legal assistance
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.38
Mutual legal assistance: freezing and confiscation
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.39
Extradition
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.40
Other forms of international cooperation
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
Explore 11 Immediate OutcomesSee how FATF rates whether the AML/CFT system works in practice.
HE · High effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to a very large extent; only minor improvements are needed.
SE · Substantial effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to a large extent; moderate improvements are needed.
ME · Moderate effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to some extent; major improvements are needed.
LE · Low effectivenessThe outcome is not achieved, or only to a negligible extent; fundamental improvements are needed.
IO1
Risk understanding & national coordination

Money laundering and terrorist financing risks are understood and, where appropriate, actions co-ordinated domestically to combat money laundering and the financing of terrorism and proliferation.

SESubstantial effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to a large extent; moderate improvements are needed.
IO2
International cooperation

International co-operation delivers appropriate information, financial intelligence, and evidence, and facilitates action against criminals and their assets.

SESubstantial effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to a large extent; moderate improvements are needed.
IO3
AML/CFT supervision

Supervisors appropriately supervise, monitor and regulate financial institutions, DNFBPs and VASPs for compliance with AML/CFT requirements commensurate with their risks.

SESubstantial effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to a large extent; moderate improvements are needed.
IO4
Preventive measures & suspicious reporting

Financial institutions, DNFBPs and VASPs adequately apply AML/CFT preventive measures commensurate with their risks, and report suspicious transactions.

MEModerate effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to some extent; major improvements are needed.
IO5
Beneficial ownership transparency

Legal persons and arrangements are prevented from misuse for money laundering or terrorist financing, and information on their beneficial ownership is available to competent authorities without impediments.

LELow effectivenessThe outcome is not achieved, or only to a negligible extent; fundamental improvements are needed.
IO6
Use of financial intelligence

Financial intelligence and all other relevant information are appropriately used by competent authorities for money laundering and terrorist financing investigations.

MEModerate effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to some extent; major improvements are needed.
IO7
Money laundering investigation & prosecution

Money laundering offences and activities are investigated and offenders are prosecuted and subject to effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions.

MEModerate effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to some extent; major improvements are needed.
IO8
Confiscation & asset recovery

Proceeds and instrumentalities of crime are confiscated.

MEModerate effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to some extent; major improvements are needed.
IO9
Terrorist financing investigation & prosecution

Terrorist financing offences and activities are investigated and persons who finance terrorism are prosecuted and subject to effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions.

SESubstantial effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to a large extent; moderate improvements are needed.
IO10
Terrorist financing prevention & NPO protection

Terrorists, terrorist organisations and terrorist financiers are prevented from raising, moving and using funds, and from abusing the NPO sector.

SESubstantial effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to a large extent; moderate improvements are needed.
IO11
Proliferation financing financial sanctions

Persons and entities involved in the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction are prevented from raising, moving and using funds, consistent with the relevant UNSCRs.

MEModerate effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to some extent; major improvements are needed.
Official FATF consolidated ratings · 2013 Methodology

Regulatory Timeline44

LOCAL changes 15
GLOBAL milestones 29
National history from1989
20262 events
29.09.2026
LOCALAssessmentFATF
FATF and APG publish Canada’s fifth-round Mutual Evaluation Report

On 29 September 2026, Canada confirmed publication of the FATF and Asia/Pacific Group on Money Laundering fifth-round Mutual Evaluation Report assessing Canada’s AML/ATF/CPF system. The publication replaces the earlier post-Plenary status in which the report had been adopted but was still pending public release.

Effective not specifiedOpen update ↗
26.03.2026
LOCALAmendmentFINTRAC
Canada’s revised AML administrative monetary penalty framework comes into force

The Strengthening Canada’s Immigration System and Borders Act (Bill C-12) received Royal Assent on 26 March 2026 and introduced a revised administrative monetary penalty framework under the PCMLTFA. FINTRAC confirms that the amendments came into force that day and apply to violations occurring after 26 March 2026.

Effective 26.03.2026Open update ↗
20253 events
18.06.2025
GLOBALGlobal standardPayment transparencyFATFBanking / Credit InstitutionsPayments / EMI / Money Transfer
FATF updates Standards on Recommendation 16 on Payment Transparency

FATF revised Recommendation 16 to standardise payment information and strengthen fraud/error controls in cross-border payments.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member · also APG

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Published 18.06.2025 · Future-effective global standard · Country implementation is separateOpen update ↗
25.02.2025
GLOBALGlobal standardRisk-based approach / financial inclusionFATF
FATF updates Standards and consults on guidance to better promote financial inclusion

FATF amended Recommendation 1 and related interpretive material to strengthen proportionality and simplified measures under the risk-based approach.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member · also APG

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 25.02.2025 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
20242 events
19.08.2024
LOCALNew ruleFINTRACBanking / Credit InstitutionsPayments / EMI / Money Transfer
FINTRAC sanctions-evasion suspicious transaction reporting requirement takes effect

Reporting entities must consider suspected sanctions evasion within suspicious transaction reporting obligations under the expanded regime.

Effective 19.08.2024Open update ↗
20232 events
27.10.2023
GLOBALGlobal standardAsset recoveryFATF
FATF strengthens global asset-recovery and confiscation standards

FATF revised Recommendations 4, 30, 31 and 38 and related interpretive material to make asset recovery a stronger operational priority, expand tools to trace and confiscate criminal property and improve domestic and international cooperation.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member · also APG

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 27.10.2023 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
24.02.2023
GLOBALGlobal standardBeneficial ownershipFATF
FATF strengthens beneficial-ownership transparency for trusts and legal arrangements

At its February 2023 Plenary FATF revised Recommendation 25 and its Interpretive Note to strengthen transparency and beneficial-ownership requirements for trusts and similar legal arrangements, complementing the 2022 strengthening of Recommendation 24 for legal persons.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member · also APG

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 24.02.2023 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
20221 event
04.03.2022
GLOBALGlobal standardBeneficial ownershipFATF
FATF Recommendation 24 — beneficial ownership of legal persons

FATF strengthened Recommendation 24 on beneficial ownership transparency for legal persons.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member · also APG

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 04.03.2022 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
20211 event
01.06.2021
LOCALNew ruleFINTRACBanking / Credit InstitutionsPayments / EMI / Money Transfer
Major PCMLTFA regulatory amendments take effect across Canada’s reporting-entity framework

A major package of amendments expanded client-identification, beneficial-ownership, virtual currency and reporting requirements.

Effective 01.06.2021Open update ↗
20202 events
23.10.2020
GLOBALGlobal standardPFFATF
FATF requires proliferation-financing risk assessment and mitigation

FATF amended Recommendations 1 and 2 and their Interpretive Notes so countries and covered private-sector entities must identify, assess and mitigate risks of breaches, non-implementation or evasion of proliferation-related targeted financial sanctions.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member · also APG

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 23.10.2020 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
02.07.2020
GLOBALSupervisory standardSupervisory cooperation
Basel Committee strengthens cooperation between prudential and AML/CFT supervisors

The Basel Committee revised its ML/TF risk-management guidelines to add principles for information exchange and cooperation between prudential and AML/CFT supervisors in authorisation, ongoing supervision and enforcement.

COUNTRY APPLICABILITYNon-binding global benchmark

A Basel supervisory publication does not become domestic law merely because it is GLOBAL. National adoption, supervisory use or incorporation must be evidenced by a LOCAL milestone or source.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ↗
Global supervisory benchmark · 02.07.2020 · Domestic adoption is separateOpen update ↗
20191 event
21.06.2019
GLOBALGlobal standardVirtual assets / Travel RuleFATF
FATF adopts the R.15 Interpretive Note and applies the Travel Rule framework to VASPs

FATF adopted detailed implementation requirements for virtual assets and VASPs in June 2019, including the application of wire-transfer information requirements commonly described as the Travel Rule. This operationalised the virtual-asset perimeter introduced through the 2018 Recommendation 15 revision.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member · also APG

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 21.06.2019 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
20181 event
19.10.2018
GLOBALGlobal standardVirtual assets / VASPsFATF
FATF Recommendation 15 is revised for virtual assets and VASPs

In October 2018 FATF revised Recommendation 15 and added the definitions of virtual asset and virtual asset service provider, formally bringing virtual-asset activity into the global AML/CFT standards architecture. Detailed implementation requirements followed in 2019.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member · also APG

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 19.10.2018 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
20141 event
15.01.2014
GLOBALSupervisory standardBank supervision
Basel Committee integrates ML/TF risk into banks’ overall risk-management framework

The Basel Committee issued Sound management of risks related to money laundering and financing of terrorism, superseding its 2001 CDD and 2004 consolidated KYC papers and integrating ML/TF risk management with prudential supervisory expectations.

COUNTRY APPLICABILITYNon-binding global benchmark

A Basel supervisory publication does not become domestic law merely because it is GLOBAL. National adoption, supervisory use or incorporation must be evidenced by a LOCAL milestone or source.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ↗
Global supervisory benchmark · 15.01.2014 · Domestic adoption is separateOpen update ↗
20121 event
16.02.2012
GLOBALGlobal standardAML/CFT/CPF standardsFATF
International Standards on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism & Proliferation

FATF adopted a consolidated revised set of 40 Recommendations integrating AML, CFT and proliferation-financing safeguards.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member · also APG

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 16.02.2012 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
20064 events
23.12.2006
GLOBALUNSC · bindingPF / TFS
UN Security Council Resolution 1737 establishes Iran proliferation-related asset-freeze measures

Resolution 1737 imposed binding measures concerning Iran’s proliferation-sensitive nuclear activities, including an asset freeze on designated individuals and entities. Together with the DPRK regime, it forms a foundational UN counter-proliferation targeted-financial-sanctions architecture.

CURRENT CHARTER RELATIONSHIPUN Member State · Article 25 obligation

UN Members agree to accept and carry out Security Council decisions. This current Charter relationship is not proof of the jurisdiction’s domestic implementation, nor a claim about its membership status on the historical event date.

UN Charter · Article 25 ↗
Binding UNSC architecture · 23.12.2006 · National implementation is separateOpen update ↗
14.10.2006
GLOBALUNSC · bindingPF / TFS
UN Security Council Resolution 1718 establishes DPRK proliferation-related asset-freeze measures

Following the DPRK nuclear test, Resolution 1718 imposed binding sanctions including an asset freeze on designated persons and entities connected to the nuclear programme. It became a central UN targeted-financial-sanctions pillar for counter-proliferation financing.

CURRENT CHARTER RELATIONSHIPUN Member State · Article 25 obligation

UN Members agree to accept and carry out Security Council decisions. This current Charter relationship is not proof of the jurisdiction’s domestic implementation, nor a claim about its membership status on the historical event date.

UN Charter · Article 25 ↗
Binding UNSC architecture · 14.10.2006 · National implementation is separateOpen update ↗
2006
LOCALAmendmentFINTRACBanking / Credit InstitutionsPayments / EMI / Money Transfer
PCMLTFA amendments expand coverage and enforcement tools

Canada expanded coverage to new entities and professions, introduced an administrative monetary penalties regime and required MSB registration.

Effective 2006Open update ↗
20042 events
2004-10
GLOBALGlobal standardCFT / cash couriersFATF
FATF Ninth Special Recommendation

FATF added a ninth Special Recommendation addressing cash couriers and cross-border movement of currency.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member · also APG

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 2004-10 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
28.04.2004
GLOBALUNSC · bindingPF / WMD controls
UN Security Council Resolution 1540 creates binding global WMD-proliferation control duties

Resolution 1540 requires all States to adopt and enforce laws and domestic controls to prevent non-State actors from acquiring or using weapons of mass destruction and related materials. It forms a binding global legal pillar of the proliferation-financing control environment later reflected in FATF CPF standards.

CURRENT CHARTER RELATIONSHIPUN Member State · Article 25 obligation

UN Members agree to accept and carry out Security Council decisions. This current Charter relationship is not proof of the jurisdiction’s domestic implementation, nor a claim about its membership status on the historical event date.

UN Charter · Article 25 ↗
Binding UNSC architecture · 28.04.2004 · National implementation is separateOpen update ↗
20032 events
31.10.2003
GLOBALTreatyML / asset recovery
UNCAC adds a universal anti-corruption, laundering and asset-recovery treaty layer

The UN General Assembly adopted the United Nations Convention against Corruption on 31 October 2003. UNCAC addresses prevention of money laundering, laundering of corruption proceeds, confiscation and a dedicated asset-recovery framework; the Convention entered into force globally on 14 December 2005.

CURRENT TREATY STATUSParty

Current UN depositary relationship to 2003 UN Convention against Corruption. This is not a claim that the jurisdiction was already a Party on the GLOBAL event date; the national accession/ratification date is a separate LOCAL/STATUS fact.

UN Treaty Collection ↗
Treaty adopted 31.10.2003 · Global entry into force 14.12.2005 · Country treaty status is separateOpen update ↗
2003-06
GLOBALGlobal standardAML/CFT standardsFATF
The FATF Recommendations — 2003 revision

FATF comprehensively revised its AML/CFT Recommendations, strengthening preventive measures and extending coverage.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member · also APG

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 2003-06 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
20021 event
20015 events
24.12.2001
LOCALAmendmentFINTRACBanking / Credit InstitutionsPayments / EMI / Money Transfer
Anti-Terrorism Act expands the regime to terrorist financing

Canada expanded the AML regime to terrorist activity financing and renamed the governing statute PCMLTFA.

Effective 24.12.2001Open update ↗
04.10.2001
GLOBALSupervisory standardCDD / KYC
Basel Committee establishes a global customer-due-diligence benchmark for banks

The Basel Committee issued Customer due diligence for banks, setting minimum supervisory expectations for customer acceptance, identification, ongoing monitoring and risk management. It became an influential global banking KYC/CDD benchmark and was later reflected in FATF standards.

COUNTRY APPLICABILITYNon-binding global benchmark

A Basel supervisory publication does not become domestic law merely because it is GLOBAL. National adoption, supervisory use or incorporation must be evidenced by a LOCAL milestone or source.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ↗
Global supervisory benchmark · 04.10.2001 · Domestic adoption is separateOpen update ↗
2001-10
GLOBALGlobal standardCFTFATF
FATF Special Recommendations on Terrorist Financing

FATF expanded its standards to terrorist financing through eight Special Recommendations.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member · also APG

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 2001-10 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
28.09.2001
GLOBALUNSC · bindingCFT / TFS
UN Security Council Resolution 1373 imposes binding CFT and freezing duties on all States

Resolution 1373 requires all States to prevent and suppress terrorist financing, criminalise the provision or collection of funds for terrorist acts, freeze terrorist assets without delay and prohibit making funds or financial services available to terrorists and related entities.

CURRENT CHARTER RELATIONSHIPUN Member State · Article 25 obligation

UN Members agree to accept and carry out Security Council decisions. This current Charter relationship is not proof of the jurisdiction’s domestic implementation, nor a claim about its membership status on the historical event date.

UN Charter · Article 25 ↗
Binding UNSC architecture · 28.09.2001 · National implementation is separateOpen update ↗
2001
LOCALNew ruleFINTRAC
FINTRAC becomes operational for suspicious transaction reporting

After its statutory creation in 2000, FINTRAC began receiving suspicious transaction reports and voluntary information in fall 2001. The distinction separates legal creation of the FIU from the operational start of the reporting/intelligence system.

Effective 2001Open update ↗
20002 events
15.11.2000
GLOBALTreatyML / organised crime
Palermo Convention broadens the international money-laundering framework beyond drug trafficking

The Palermo Convention was adopted on 15 November 2000 and broadened the international money-laundering framework beyond drug proceeds through criminalisation and preventive measures tied to transnational organised crime. It entered into force globally on 29 September 2003.

CURRENT TREATY STATUSParty

Current UN depositary relationship to 2000 Palermo Convention. This is not a claim that the jurisdiction was already a Party on the GLOBAL event date; the national accession/ratification date is a separate LOCAL/STATUS fact.

UN Treaty Collection ↗
Treaty adopted 15.11.2000 · Global entry into force 29.09.2003 · Country treaty status is separateOpen update ↗
19992 events
09.12.1999
GLOBALTreatyCFT
UN Terrorist Financing Convention establishes a treaty-level CFT framework

The UN General Assembly adopted the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism on 9 December 1999, creating the treaty framework for criminalising terrorist financing and international cooperation. It entered into force globally on 10 April 2002.

CURRENT TREATY STATUSParty

Current UN depositary relationship to 1999 Terrorist Financing Convention. This is not a claim that the jurisdiction was already a Party on the GLOBAL event date; the national accession/ratification date is a separate LOCAL/STATUS fact.

UN Treaty Collection ↗
Treaty adopted 09.12.1999 · Global entry into force 10.04.2002 · Country treaty status is separateOpen update ↗
15.10.1999
GLOBALUNSC · bindingTFS
UN Security Council Resolution 1267 establishes a targeted asset-freeze regime

Resolution 1267 imposed an assets freeze and other targeted sanctions in the Taliban context and created the Security Council committee that became the foundation of the UN 1267 sanctions architecture. It is a key global precursor to modern terrorist-financing targeted financial sanctions.

CURRENT CHARTER RELATIONSHIPUN Member State · Article 25 obligation

UN Members agree to accept and carry out Security Council decisions. This current Charter relationship is not proof of the jurisdiction’s domestic implementation, nor a claim about its membership status on the historical event date.

UN Charter · Article 25 ↗
Binding UNSC architecture · 15.10.1999 · National implementation is separateOpen update ↗
19961 event
1996
GLOBALGlobal standardAML standardsFATF
The FATF Recommendations — 1996 revision

FATF revised the Forty Recommendations to reflect evolving money-laundering methods and countermeasures.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member · also APG

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 1996 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
19951 event
09.06.1995
GLOBALFIU cooperationFIU cooperation
Egmont Group creates the global FIU cooperation network

Representatives of 13 financial intelligence units met in Brussels on 9 June 1995 and founded what became the Egmont Group. The milestone created the operational global network for FIU-to-FIU cooperation and exchange of financial intelligence.

CURRENT EGMONT RELATIONSHIPMember FIU · FINTRAC

Current profile relationship to the Egmont network. This does not imply membership in 1995; admission history is a separate LOCAL/STATUS fact.

Egmont Group · Member FIUs ↗
Global FIU cooperation infrastructure · 09.06.1995 · FIU membership is separateOpen update ↗
19911 event
19902 events
1990
GLOBALGlobal standardAML standardsFATF
The Forty Recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering

FATF issued its original Forty Recommendations, establishing the first global AML standard framework.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member · also APG

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 1990 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
19892 events
1989
GLOBALGlobal institutionGlobal standard-settingFATF
Financial Action Task Force is established by the G7

The G7 established FATF in 1989 to examine and develop measures to combat money laundering. FATF became the central global standard-setting body whose recommendations are implemented through national and regional AML/CFT frameworks.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member · also APG

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global institutional milestone · 1989 · Country membership is separateOpen update ↗
1989
LOCALNew ruleFATF
Canada participates in the 1989 establishment of FATF

Canada was among the original jurisdictions in the FATF framework established by the G7 in 1989. This marks the start of Canada’s role in the international AML standard-setting architecture, preceding its modern domestic PCML statute.

Effective 1989Open update ↗
19882 events
20.12.1988
GLOBALTreatyML criminalisation
Vienna Convention creates the first treaty-level international money-laundering criminalisation baseline

The Vienna Convention was adopted on 20 December 1988 and created the first treaty-level international obligation to criminalise laundering conduct linked to drug-trafficking proceeds, alongside confiscation and international-cooperation measures. It entered into force globally on 11 November 1990.

CURRENT TREATY STATUSParty

Current UN depositary relationship to 1988 Vienna Convention. This is not a claim that the jurisdiction was already a Party on the GLOBAL event date; the national accession/ratification date is a separate LOCAL/STATUS fact.

UN Treaty Collection ↗
Treaty adopted 20.12.1988 · Global entry into force 11.11.1990 · Country treaty status is separateOpen update ↗
1988-12
GLOBALSupervisory standardBank AML / KYC
Basel Committee issues principles to prevent criminal use of banks for money laundering

The Basel Committee published a Statement of Principles for banks aimed at reducing the risk that banking institutions would be used by criminals or as channels for money laundering. This helped establish the preventive and supervisory side of AML alongside the emerging criminal-law framework.

COUNTRY APPLICABILITYNon-binding global benchmark

A Basel supervisory publication does not become domestic law merely because it is GLOBAL. National adoption, supervisory use or incorporation must be evidenced by a LOCAL milestone or source.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ↗
Global supervisory benchmark · 1988-12 · Domestic adoption is separateOpen update ↗

Sources & Verification22

Statement welcoming the FATF/APG Mutual Evaluation Report of CanadaDepartment of Finance Canada · ASSESSMENT / PROFILECanada National Risk Assessment 2025FINTRAC · ASSESSMENT / PROFILEBeneficial ownership discrepancy reporting requirements from 1 October 2025FINTRAC · GUIDANCEFederal beneficial ownership registry launched for CBCA corporationsCorporations Canada · REGISTER / DATAReporting suspected sanctions evasion to FINTRACFINTRAC · GUIDANCECanada Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorist Financing Regime Strategy 2023–2026Department of Finance Canada · REPORT / PUBLICATIONCanada Follow-Up Report 2021Financial Action Task Force (FATF) · ASSESSMENT / PROFILEHistory of the FATFFinancial Action Task Force (FATF) · INSTITUTIONAL / REFERENCECanadian AML regime history — 1991 Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) ActFINTRAC · LAW / REGULATIONEgmont Group Member FIU InformationEgmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units · INSTITUTIONAL / REFERENCEFATF RecommendationsFinancial Action Task Force (FATF) · OFFICIAL SOURCEFATF Countries & Global NetworkFinancial Action Task Force (FATF) · OFFICIAL SOURCEAsia/Pacific Group on Money LaunderingFinancial Action Task Force (FATF) · OFFICIAL SOURCEFATF consolidated assessment ratingsTechnical Compliance & Effectiveness · 2013 MethodologyMutual Evaluation Report · 2016-09Official FATF / regional assessmentFollow-Up Report · 2021-09Official follow-up / technical rating updateFINTRAC · Reporting suspicious transactionsFINTRAC · GUIDANCEFINTRAC Acts & RegulationsFINTRAC · LAW / REGULATIONFINTRAC · Large cash transactionsFINTRAC · GUIDANCEFINTRAC · Large virtual currency transactionsFINTRAC · GUIDANCEFINTRAC · Electronic funds transfersFINTRAC · GUIDANCEFINTRAC GuidanceFINTRAC · GUIDANCE