Argentina
Overview
Argentina’s AML/CFT framework centres on Law No. 25.246, substantially modernised by Law No. 27.739 in 2024 and subsequent implementing measures. UIF is the national FIU and issues risk-based regulations to obliged sectors.
Law No. 27.739 strengthened beneficial-owner concepts and created a public beneficial-ownership register architecture. Sector rules require identification of final beneficial owners within CDD.
Obliged subjects must submit suspicious and prescribed systematic reports to UIF. Current risk-based resolutions specify customer identification, monitoring, self-assessment and reporting by sector. CNV General Resolution 1166/2026 also requires CNV-registered obliged subjects to use specified traceable account/CVU transfer routes for client-fund receipts and payments within the PLA/FT/FP control framework.
Compliance Calendar5
Requirement
Real Estate
Real Property Registries — UIF Resolution 93/2026 implementation
Authority / Report toUnidad de Información Financiera (UIF)
Deadline / triggerNew monthly systematic-report form/content applies from November 2026. The core Resolution 93/2026 regime applies from 8 November 2026. Manual, Code of Conduct and technology adaptation deadline: 7 April 2027.
Requirement
- Sector scope
- Real Estate
- Subject scope
- Real Property Registries (Registros de la Propiedad Inmueble) that are obliged subjects under article 20(19) of Law 25,246.
- Trigger
- Publication of UIF Resolution 93/2026 on 10 August 2026 and the transition provisions in article 23.
- Filing channel
- UIF digital reporting mechanisms for systematic reports; internal implementation for the prevention manual, Code of Conduct and technology controls.
- Legal basis
Impact
- Consequences of non-compliance
- Breaches of duties under Resolution 93/2026 are sanctionable under Chapter IV of Law 25,246.
- Enforcement authority
- UIF Argentina
- Operational impact
- Real Property Registries should update risk-based controls, monthly reporting configuration, governance documents and supporting technology against the staged Resolution 93/2026 implementation dates.
Requirement
Reporte Sistemático Mensual (RSM) — applicable sectors
Authority / Report toUIF Argentina
Deadline / triggerBy the 15th day of each month for the immediately preceding calendar month.
Requirement
- Subject scope
- Obliged subjects covered by UIF resolutions requiring monthly systematic reporting.
- Trigger
- End of a month with reportable operations; applicable no-movements filing where none occurred.
- Filing channel
- UIF RSM / SRO+ tools.
Impact
- Consequences of non-compliance
- Late/non-filing may result in UIF administrative sanctions.
- Enforcement authority
- UIF Argentina
- Operational impact
- Schedule a monthly close before the 15th and retain sector-specific report schemas.
Requirement
ROS-LA / RFT / RFP suspicious reporting
Authority / Report toUnidad de Información Financiera (UIF)
Deadline / trigger24 hours. ROS-LA: from conclusion that it is suspicious and not later than 90 calendar days from the performed/attempted operation. TF/PF: 24 hours from the performed/attempted operation.
Requirement
- Subject scope
- Obliged subjects under article 20 of Law 25,246, subject to sector rules.
- Trigger
- For ML: conclusion that the analysed operation is suspicious. For TF/PF: the relevant performed/attempted operation.
- Filing channel
- UIF electronic reporting systems.
Impact
- Consequences of non-compliance
- Failure to report can lead to UIF administrative sanctions and other consequences under Law 25,246.
- Enforcement authority
- UIF Argentina
- Operational impact
- Distinguish the internal analysis period from the post-classification filing clock.
Requirement
AML/CFT/CPF risk-based controls
Authority / Report toUIF Argentina / sector supervisor
Deadline / triggerOngoing; risk self-assessment, CDD, monitoring, policies, governance and recordkeeping apply under sector rules.
Requirement
- Subject scope
- Obliged subjects under Law 25,246 and sector UIF resolutions.
- Trigger
- While carrying on covered activities/business relationships.
- Filing channel
- Internal control environment and sector-required filings.
Impact
- Consequences of non-compliance
- Control failures may lead to UIF administrative proceedings and sector-supervisory action.
- Enforcement authority
- UIF Argentina / competent supervisor
- Operational impact
- Map sector-specific self-assessment/review cycles instead of one universal annual date.
Requirement
Securities / Investment
CNV traceable client-fund receipt and payment controls
Authority / Report toComisión Nacional de Valores (CNV) supervisory oversight; this is a transaction-control obligation rather than a separate periodic filing
Deadline / triggerPer transaction / ongoing from 15 September 2026. Use the permitted bank-account or CVU transfer routes and preserve identification and traceability; cheque payment is no longer a permitted modality under amended Article 3.
Requirement
- Sector scope
- Securities / Investment
- Subject scope
- Obliged subjects registered with the Comisión Nacional de Valores (CNV), including applicable market intermediaries under Title XI of the CNV Rules.
- Trigger
- Each receipt of client funds or payment/delivery of funds to clients in covered CNV activity.
- Filing channel
- Execute client-fund movements through the prescribed traceable account/CVU routes and retain the transaction/control evidence required by the CNV framework.
Impact
- Consequences of non-compliance
- Non-compliance can form part of CNV supervisory or enforcement action under the capital-markets and AML/CFT/PF control framework; no single penalty amount is asserted here.
- Enforcement authority
- Comisión Nacional de Valores (CNV)
- Operational impact
- Remove cheque-based client-fund payment workflows from the covered CNV process and enforce account ownership/CVU identification and transfer traceability at transaction execution.
Authorities & FIU5
FATF Assessment
Measures how fully the jurisdiction has implemented FATF’s technical requirements. It does not measure practical effectiveness.
Measures whether the AML/CFT system achieves its intended results in practice. Follow-up reports do not normally replace these ratings.
Explore 40 FATF RecommendationsSee every Technical Compliance rating and what it means.+
Explore 11 Immediate OutcomesSee how FATF rates whether the AML/CFT system works in practice.+
Regulatory Timeline44
Argentina’s UIF amended Resolution 78/2023 for CNV-supervised capital-market entities: specified statutory contributions to Fondos de Asistencia Laboral (FAL) and certain other FAL receipts subject to redemption restrictions are excepted from measures in the implementing regulation. The amendment also updates statutory obliged-person cross-references. It does not remove regulated entities’ other AML obligations. Adopted 17 September and effective on publication 18 September 2026.
Argentina’s CNV published General Resolution 1166/2026, replacing Article 3 of Section II, Title XI of the CNV Rules within the PLA/FT/FP control framework. The measure requires CNV-registered obliged subjects to use specified traceable bank-account or CVU transfer routes for receiving and paying client funds and removes cheque use from those payment modalities.
Argentina’s UIF published Resolution 93/2026 on 10 August 2026, replacing the prior framework for Real Property Registries with minimum risk-based AML/CFT/PF requirements and revised systematic-reporting rules.
UIF Resolution 37/2026 amended Resolution 50/2011 and took effect on Official Gazette publication on 14 April 2026. Reporting entities must attach supporting registration documentation through SRO+, including ownership, management and beneficial-owner materials as applicable. Articles 3 bis, ter and quater are replaced; the regulation also provides administrative working-day deadlines for documentation remediation and updates to registered contact and compliance-officer details.
Published on 31 March 2026, UIF Resolution 35/2026 regulates AML/CFT/CPF information exchange among Argentina’s designated financial supervisors (the BCRA, CNV, SSN and INAES) and comparable foreign authorities. It provides use and onward-disclosure safeguards, repeals UIF Resolution 233/2025 and commences on the date of Official Gazette publication under Article 9.
UIF Resolution 3/2026, published in Argentina’s Official Gazette on 8 January 2026, establishes operational measures for reporting suspected proliferation financing and administrative freezing of property related to designated persons and entities. Article 8 requires reporting entities notified of a freezing decision to screen their customer base, immobilise applicable assets and report implementation results within 24 hours of notification. Article 12 sets commencement upon Gazette publication.
FATF revised Recommendation 16 to standardise payment information and strengthen fraud/error controls in cross-border payments.
Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.
FATF Global Network ↗FATF amended Recommendation 1 and related interpretive material to strengthen proportionality and simplified measures under the risk-based approach.
Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.
FATF Global Network ↗CNV General Resolution 994 implements registration of virtual-asset service providers created by Law No. 27.739 as part of the AML supervisory architecture.
PSAVs became subject to risk assessment, CDD, monitoring, reporting and internal-control requirements under a dedicated UIF regulation.
The reform updates Law No. 25.246, strengthens beneficial-owner transparency, expands obliged subjects and establishes the legal basis for regulation and registration of virtual-asset service providers.
FATF revised Recommendations 4, 30, 31 and 38 and related interpretive material to make asset recovery a stronger operational priority, expand tools to trace and confiscate criminal property and improve domestic and international cooperation.
Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.
FATF Global Network ↗At its February 2023 Plenary FATF revised Recommendation 25 and its Interpretive Note to strengthen transparency and beneficial-ownership requirements for trusts and similar legal arrangements, complementing the 2022 strengthening of Recommendation 24 for legal persons.
Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.
FATF Global Network ↗FATF strengthened Recommendation 24 on beneficial ownership transparency for legal persons.
Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.
FATF Global Network ↗FATF amended Recommendations 1 and 2 and their Interpretive Notes so countries and covered private-sector entities must identify, assess and mitigate risks of breaches, non-implementation or evasion of proliferation-related targeted financial sanctions.
Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.
FATF Global Network ↗The Basel Committee revised its ML/TF risk-management guidelines to add principles for information exchange and cooperation between prudential and AML/CFT supervisors in authorisation, ongoing supervision and enforcement.
A Basel supervisory publication does not become domestic law merely because it is GLOBAL. National adoption, supervisory use or incorporation must be evidenced by a LOCAL milestone or source.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ↗FATF adopted detailed implementation requirements for virtual assets and VASPs in June 2019, including the application of wire-transfer information requirements commonly described as the Travel Rule. This operationalised the virtual-asset perimeter introduced through the 2018 Recommendation 15 revision.
Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.
FATF Global Network ↗In October 2018 FATF revised Recommendation 15 and added the definitions of virtual asset and virtual asset service provider, formally bringing virtual-asset activity into the global AML/CFT standards architecture. Detailed implementation requirements followed in 2019.
Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.
FATF Global Network ↗FATF removed Argentina from its on-going global AML/CFT compliance monitoring process.
The Basel Committee issued Sound management of risks related to money laundering and financing of terrorism, superseding its 2001 CDD and 2004 consolidated KYC papers and integrating ML/TF risk management with prudential supervisory expectations.
A Basel supervisory publication does not become domestic law merely because it is GLOBAL. National adoption, supervisory use or incorporation must be evidenced by a LOCAL milestone or source.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ↗FATF adopted a consolidated revised set of 40 Recommendations integrating AML, CFT and proliferation-financing safeguards.
Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.
FATF Global Network ↗FATF identified Argentina in its on-going global AML/CFT compliance process.
Resolution 1737 imposed binding measures concerning Iran’s proliferation-sensitive nuclear activities, including an asset freeze on designated individuals and entities. Together with the DPRK regime, it forms a foundational UN counter-proliferation targeted-financial-sanctions architecture.
UN Members agree to accept and carry out Security Council decisions. This current Charter relationship is not proof of the jurisdiction’s domestic implementation, nor a claim about its membership status on the historical event date.
UN Charter · Article 25 ↗Following the DPRK nuclear test, Resolution 1718 imposed binding sanctions including an asset freeze on designated persons and entities connected to the nuclear programme. It became a central UN targeted-financial-sanctions pillar for counter-proliferation financing.
UN Members agree to accept and carry out Security Council decisions. This current Charter relationship is not proof of the jurisdiction’s domestic implementation, nor a claim about its membership status on the historical event date.
UN Charter · Article 25 ↗FATF added a ninth Special Recommendation addressing cash couriers and cross-border movement of currency.
Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.
FATF Global Network ↗Resolution 1540 requires all States to adopt and enforce laws and domestic controls to prevent non-State actors from acquiring or using weapons of mass destruction and related materials. It forms a binding global legal pillar of the proliferation-financing control environment later reflected in FATF CPF standards.
UN Members agree to accept and carry out Security Council decisions. This current Charter relationship is not proof of the jurisdiction’s domestic implementation, nor a claim about its membership status on the historical event date.
UN Charter · Article 25 ↗The UN General Assembly adopted the United Nations Convention against Corruption on 31 October 2003. UNCAC addresses prevention of money laundering, laundering of corruption proceeds, confiscation and a dedicated asset-recovery framework; the Convention entered into force globally on 14 December 2005.
Current UN depositary relationship to 2003 UN Convention against Corruption. This is not a claim that the jurisdiction was already a Party on the GLOBAL event date; the national accession/ratification date is a separate LOCAL/STATUS fact.
UN Treaty Collection ↗The Egmont Group's official Member FIU Information register records Argentina's FIU admission date as 2003-07-23.
FATF comprehensively revised its AML/CFT Recommendations, strengthening preventive measures and extending coverage.
Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.
FATF Global Network ↗The Basel Committee issued Customer due diligence for banks, setting minimum supervisory expectations for customer acceptance, identification, ongoing monitoring and risk management. It became an influential global banking KYC/CDD benchmark and was later reflected in FATF standards.
A Basel supervisory publication does not become domestic law merely because it is GLOBAL. National adoption, supervisory use or incorporation must be evidenced by a LOCAL milestone or source.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ↗FATF expanded its standards to terrorist financing through eight Special Recommendations.
Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.
FATF Global Network ↗Resolution 1373 requires all States to prevent and suppress terrorist financing, criminalise the provision or collection of funds for terrorist acts, freeze terrorist assets without delay and prohibit making funds or financial services available to terrorists and related entities.
UN Members agree to accept and carry out Security Council decisions. This current Charter relationship is not proof of the jurisdiction’s domestic implementation, nor a claim about its membership status on the historical event date.
UN Charter · Article 25 ↗GAFILAT records Argentina among the nine governments that signed the constitutive Memorandum of Understanding on 8 December 2000.
The Palermo Convention was adopted on 15 November 2000 and broadened the international money-laundering framework beyond drug proceeds through criminalisation and preventive measures tied to transnational organised crime. It entered into force globally on 29 September 2003.
Current UN depositary relationship to 2000 Palermo Convention. This is not a claim that the jurisdiction was already a Party on the GLOBAL event date; the national accession/ratification date is a separate LOCAL/STATUS fact.
UN Treaty Collection ↗Law No. 25.246 creates UIF, establishes laundering prevention and reporting duties, and forms the statutory backbone of Argentina’s AML regime.
FATF records Argentina as a member since 2000.
The UN General Assembly adopted the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism on 9 December 1999, creating the treaty framework for criminalising terrorist financing and international cooperation. It entered into force globally on 10 April 2002.
Current UN depositary relationship to 1999 Terrorist Financing Convention. This is not a claim that the jurisdiction was already a Party on the GLOBAL event date; the national accession/ratification date is a separate LOCAL/STATUS fact.
UN Treaty Collection ↗Resolution 1267 imposed an assets freeze and other targeted sanctions in the Taliban context and created the Security Council committee that became the foundation of the UN 1267 sanctions architecture. It is a key global precursor to modern terrorist-financing targeted financial sanctions.
UN Members agree to accept and carry out Security Council decisions. This current Charter relationship is not proof of the jurisdiction’s domestic implementation, nor a claim about its membership status on the historical event date.
UN Charter · Article 25 ↗FATF revised the Forty Recommendations to reflect evolving money-laundering methods and countermeasures.
Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.
FATF Global Network ↗Representatives of 13 financial intelligence units met in Brussels on 9 June 1995 and founded what became the Egmont Group. The milestone created the operational global network for FIU-to-FIU cooperation and exchange of financial intelligence.
Current profile relationship to the Egmont network. This does not imply membership in 1995; admission history is a separate LOCAL/STATUS fact.
Egmont Group · Member FIUs ↗FATF issued its original Forty Recommendations, establishing the first global AML standard framework.
Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.
FATF Global Network ↗The G7 established FATF in 1989 to examine and develop measures to combat money laundering. FATF became the central global standard-setting body whose recommendations are implemented through national and regional AML/CFT frameworks.
Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.
FATF Global Network ↗The Vienna Convention was adopted on 20 December 1988 and created the first treaty-level international obligation to criminalise laundering conduct linked to drug-trafficking proceeds, alongside confiscation and international-cooperation measures. It entered into force globally on 11 November 1990.
Current UN depositary relationship to 1988 Vienna Convention. This is not a claim that the jurisdiction was already a Party on the GLOBAL event date; the national accession/ratification date is a separate LOCAL/STATUS fact.
UN Treaty Collection ↗The Basel Committee published a Statement of Principles for banks aimed at reducing the risk that banking institutions would be used by criminals or as channels for money laundering. This helped establish the preventive and supervisory side of AML alongside the emerging criminal-law framework.
A Basel supervisory publication does not become domestic law merely because it is GLOBAL. National adoption, supervisory use or incorporation must be evidenced by a LOCAL milestone or source.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ↗