Global AML network view
Not publicly listed Increased monitoring Call for action Selected jurisdiction Small territory marker
100%
Select a jurisdiction on the map or list. Use zoom controls for small territories.
AMERICAS · SOUTH AMERICA

Argentina

FATF public-list status No FATF public-list status
Assessment network
Profile Changed 2026-10-15
Profile sections

Overview

Regulatory TimelineTrack FATF / FSRB and FIU-network participation alongside FATF public-list status and national regulatory activity over time.
FATFGlobal standard setter
Member · since 2000
GAFILATRegional / assessment body
Member · since 08.12.2000
Egmont GroupFIU network
FIU member · since 23.07.2003
FATF public-list status & assessments
Not publicly listed · 1 assessment milestone
Local regulatory activity
15 local changes
2000201020202026
Regulatory history timeline
Bars show verified participation periods. Diamonds mark MER / FUR assessment milestones. FATF public-list bands show status history. Local markers show regulatory changes, with marker size reflecting change density.
Jurisdiction framework
AML FrameworkNational / regional framework
Primary AML/CFT Framework

Argentina’s AML/CFT framework centres on Law No. 25.246, substantially modernised by Law No. 27.739 in 2024 and subsequent implementing measures. UIF is the national FIU and issues risk-based regulations to obliged sectors.

FATF Recommendations remain the international baseline; the cited national or regional framework controls the legal obligation.
CDD & Beneficial OwnershipCustomer / entity controls

Law No. 27.739 strengthened beneficial-owner concepts and created a public beneficial-ownership register architecture. Sector rules require identification of final beneficial owners within CDD.

Ownership, control, verification, PEP/EDD and registry rules are jurisdiction-specific. A 25% beneficial-ownership threshold is not a universal AML rule.
Monitoring & ReportingOngoing controls and FIU reporting

Obliged subjects must submit suspicious and prescribed systematic reports to UIF. Current risk-based resolutions specify customer identification, monitoring, self-assessment and reporting by sector. CNV General Resolution 1166/2026 also requires CNV-registered obliged subjects to use specified traceable account/CVU transfer routes for client-fund receipts and payments within the PLA/FT/FP control framework.

Monitoring, screening, periodic review, escalation and suspicious reporting should be read against the applicable supervisor and primary rule.

Compliance Calendar5

Scheduled obligations
2
Requirement
Real Estate
Real Property Registries — UIF Resolution 93/2026 implementation
Authority / Report toUnidad de Información Financiera (UIF)
Deadline / triggerNew monthly systematic-report form/content applies from November 2026. The core Resolution 93/2026 regime applies from 8 November 2026. Manual, Code of Conduct and technology adaptation deadline: 7 April 2027.

Requirement

Sector scope
Real Estate
Subject scope
Real Property Registries (Registros de la Propiedad Inmueble) that are obliged subjects under article 20(19) of Law 25,246.
Trigger
Publication of UIF Resolution 93/2026 on 10 August 2026 and the transition provisions in article 23.
Filing channel
UIF digital reporting mechanisms for systematic reports; internal implementation for the prevention manual, Code of Conduct and technology controls.

Impact

Consequences of non-compliance
Breaches of duties under Resolution 93/2026 are sanctionable under Chapter IV of Law 25,246.
Enforcement authority
UIF Argentina
Operational impact
Real Property Registries should update risk-based controls, monthly reporting configuration, governance documents and supporting technology against the staged Resolution 93/2026 implementation dates.
Requirement Reporte Sistemático Mensual (RSM) — applicable sectors
Authority / Report toUIF Argentina
Deadline / triggerBy the 15th day of each month for the immediately preceding calendar month.

Requirement

Subject scope
Obliged subjects covered by UIF resolutions requiring monthly systematic reporting.
Trigger
End of a month with reportable operations; applicable no-movements filing where none occurred.
Filing channel
UIF RSM / SRO+ tools.

Impact

Consequences of non-compliance
Late/non-filing may result in UIF administrative sanctions.
Enforcement authority
UIF Argentina
Operational impact
Schedule a monthly close before the 15th and retain sector-specific report schemas.
Event-driven obligations
1
Requirement ROS-LA / RFT / RFP suspicious reporting
Authority / Report toUnidad de Información Financiera (UIF)
Deadline / trigger24 hours. ROS-LA: from conclusion that it is suspicious and not later than 90 calendar days from the performed/attempted operation. TF/PF: 24 hours from the performed/attempted operation.

Requirement

Subject scope
Obliged subjects under article 20 of Law 25,246, subject to sector rules.
Trigger
For ML: conclusion that the analysed operation is suspicious. For TF/PF: the relevant performed/attempted operation.
Filing channel
UIF electronic reporting systems.

Impact

Consequences of non-compliance
Failure to report can lead to UIF administrative sanctions and other consequences under Law 25,246.
Enforcement authority
UIF Argentina
Operational impact
Distinguish the internal analysis period from the post-classification filing clock.
Ongoing obligations
2
Requirement AML/CFT/CPF risk-based controls
Authority / Report toUIF Argentina / sector supervisor
Deadline / triggerOngoing; risk self-assessment, CDD, monitoring, policies, governance and recordkeeping apply under sector rules.

Requirement

Subject scope
Obliged subjects under Law 25,246 and sector UIF resolutions.
Trigger
While carrying on covered activities/business relationships.
Filing channel
Internal control environment and sector-required filings.

Impact

Consequences of non-compliance
Control failures may lead to UIF administrative proceedings and sector-supervisory action.
Enforcement authority
UIF Argentina / competent supervisor
Operational impact
Map sector-specific self-assessment/review cycles instead of one universal annual date.
Requirement
Securities / Investment
CNV traceable client-fund receipt and payment controls
Authority / Report toComisión Nacional de Valores (CNV) supervisory oversight; this is a transaction-control obligation rather than a separate periodic filing
Deadline / triggerPer transaction / ongoing from 15 September 2026. Use the permitted bank-account or CVU transfer routes and preserve identification and traceability; cheque payment is no longer a permitted modality under amended Article 3.

Requirement

Sector scope
Securities / Investment
Subject scope
Obliged subjects registered with the Comisión Nacional de Valores (CNV), including applicable market intermediaries under Title XI of the CNV Rules.
Trigger
Each receipt of client funds or payment/delivery of funds to clients in covered CNV activity.
Filing channel
Execute client-fund movements through the prescribed traceable account/CVU routes and retain the transaction/control evidence required by the CNV framework.

Impact

Consequences of non-compliance
Non-compliance can form part of CNV supervisory or enforcement action under the capital-markets and AML/CFT/PF control framework; no single penalty amount is asserted here.
Enforcement authority
Comisión Nacional de Valores (CNV)
Operational impact
Remove cheque-based client-fund payment workflows from the covered CNV process and enforce account ownership/CVU identification and transfer traceability at transaction execution.

Authorities & FIU5

Authority / issuing bodyUnidad de Información Financiera (UIF)
Jurisdiction updatesRegulatory updates

FATF Assessment

FATF Compliance & Effectiveness
Technical Compliance40 FATF Recommendations
Ratings updated 2024-12

Measures how fully the jurisdiction has implemented FATF’s technical requirements. It does not measure practical effectiveness.

C12Compliant

Requirements met.

LC15Largely compliant

Only minor shortcomings.

PC12Partially compliant

Moderate shortcomings.

NC1Non-compliant

Major shortcomings.

NA0Not applicable

The requirement does not apply because of structural, legal or institutional features of the jurisdiction.

Effectiveness11 Immediate Outcomes
Ratings from MER 2024-12

Measures whether the AML/CFT system achieves its intended results in practice. Follow-up reports do not normally replace these ratings.

HE0High effectiveness

The outcome is achieved to a very large extent; only minor improvements are needed.

SE1Substantial effectiveness

The outcome is achieved to a large extent; moderate improvements are needed.

ME9Moderate effectiveness

The outcome is achieved to some extent; major improvements are needed.

LE1Low effectiveness

The outcome is not achieved, or only to a negligible extent; fundamental improvements are needed.

Explore 40 FATF RecommendationsSee every Technical Compliance rating and what it means.
C · CompliantRequirements met.
LC · Largely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
PC · Partially compliantModerate shortcomings.
NC · Non-compliantMajor shortcomings.
N/A · Not applicableThe requirement does not apply because of structural, legal or institutional features of the jurisdiction.
AML/CFT Policies and Coordination
R.1
Assessing Risks and Applying a Risk-Based Approach
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.2
National cooperation and coordination
CCompliantRequirements met.
Money Laundering and Confiscation
R.3
Money laundering offence
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.4
Confiscation and provisional measures
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
Terrorist Financing and Financing of Proliferation
R.5
Terrorist financing offence
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.6
Targeted financial sanctions related to terrorism & terrorist financing
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
R.7
Targeted financial sanctions related to proliferation
NCNon-compliantMajor shortcomings.
R.8
Non-profit organisations
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
Preventive Measures
R.9
Financial institution secrecy laws
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.10
Customer due diligence
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.11
Record keeping
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.12
Politically exposed persons
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.13
Correspondent banking
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.14
Money or value transfer services
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
R.15
New technologies
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
R.16
Wire transfers
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
R.17
Reliance on third parties
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
R.18
Internal controls and foreign branches and subsidiaries
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
R.19
Higher-risk countries
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.20
Reporting of suspicious transactions
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.21
Tipping-off and confidentiality
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.22
DNFBPs: Customer due diligence
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
R.23
DNFBPs: Other measures
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
Transparency and Beneficial Ownership of Legal Persons and Arrangements
R.24
Transparency and beneficial ownership of legal persons
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
R.25
Transparency and beneficial ownership of legal arrangements
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
Powers and Responsibilities of Competent Authorities and Other Institutional Measures
R.26
Regulation and supervision of financial institutions
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.27
Powers of supervisors
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.28
Regulation and supervision of DNFBPs
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.29
Financial intelligence units
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.30
Responsibilities of law enforcement and investigative authorities
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.31
Powers of law enforcement and investigative authorities
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.32
Cash couriers
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.33
Statistics
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.34
Guidance and feedback
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.35
Sanctions
CCompliantRequirements met.
International Cooperation
R.36
International instruments
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.37
Mutual legal assistance
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.38
Mutual legal assistance: freezing and confiscation
LCLargely compliantOnly minor shortcomings.
R.39
Extradition
CCompliantRequirements met.
R.40
Other forms of international cooperation
PCPartially compliantModerate shortcomings.
Explore 11 Immediate OutcomesSee how FATF rates whether the AML/CFT system works in practice.
HE · High effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to a very large extent; only minor improvements are needed.
SE · Substantial effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to a large extent; moderate improvements are needed.
ME · Moderate effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to some extent; major improvements are needed.
LE · Low effectivenessThe outcome is not achieved, or only to a negligible extent; fundamental improvements are needed.
IO1
Risk understanding & national coordination

Money laundering and terrorist financing risks are understood and, where appropriate, actions co-ordinated domestically to combat money laundering and the financing of terrorism and proliferation.

MEModerate effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to some extent; major improvements are needed.
IO2
International cooperation

International co-operation delivers appropriate information, financial intelligence, and evidence, and facilitates action against criminals and their assets.

SESubstantial effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to a large extent; moderate improvements are needed.
IO3
AML/CFT supervision

Supervisors appropriately supervise, monitor and regulate financial institutions, DNFBPs and VASPs for compliance with AML/CFT requirements commensurate with their risks.

MEModerate effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to some extent; major improvements are needed.
IO4
Preventive measures & suspicious reporting

Financial institutions, DNFBPs and VASPs adequately apply AML/CFT preventive measures commensurate with their risks, and report suspicious transactions.

MEModerate effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to some extent; major improvements are needed.
IO5
Beneficial ownership transparency

Legal persons and arrangements are prevented from misuse for money laundering or terrorist financing, and information on their beneficial ownership is available to competent authorities without impediments.

MEModerate effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to some extent; major improvements are needed.
IO6
Use of financial intelligence

Financial intelligence and all other relevant information are appropriately used by competent authorities for money laundering and terrorist financing investigations.

MEModerate effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to some extent; major improvements are needed.
IO7
Money laundering investigation & prosecution

Money laundering offences and activities are investigated and offenders are prosecuted and subject to effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions.

MEModerate effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to some extent; major improvements are needed.
IO8
Confiscation & asset recovery

Proceeds and instrumentalities of crime are confiscated.

MEModerate effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to some extent; major improvements are needed.
IO9
Terrorist financing investigation & prosecution

Terrorist financing offences and activities are investigated and persons who finance terrorism are prosecuted and subject to effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions.

MEModerate effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to some extent; major improvements are needed.
IO10
Terrorist financing prevention & NPO protection

Terrorists, terrorist organisations and terrorist financiers are prevented from raising, moving and using funds, and from abusing the NPO sector.

MEModerate effectivenessThe outcome is achieved to some extent; major improvements are needed.
IO11
Proliferation financing financial sanctions

Persons and entities involved in the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction are prevented from raising, moving and using funds, consistent with the relevant UNSCRs.

LELow effectivenessThe outcome is not achieved, or only to a negligible extent; fundamental improvements are needed.
Official FATF consolidated ratings · 2013 Methodology

Regulatory Timeline44

LOCAL changes 15
GLOBAL milestones 29
National history from2000
20266 events
18.09.2026
LOCALAmendmentSecurities / Investment
UIF Resolution 109/2026 introduces a limited AML/CFT/CPF exception for Labour Assistance Funds

Argentina’s UIF amended Resolution 78/2023 for CNV-supervised capital-market entities: specified statutory contributions to Fondos de Asistencia Laboral (FAL) and certain other FAL receipts subject to redemption restrictions are excepted from measures in the implementing regulation. The amendment also updates statutory obliged-person cross-references. It does not remove regulated entities’ other AML obligations. Adopted 17 September and effective on publication 18 September 2026.

Effective 18.09.2026Open update ↗
15.09.2026
LOCALAmendmentComisión Nacional de Valores (CNV)Securities / Investment
CNV General Resolution 1166/2026 tightens client-fund receipt and payment controls

Argentina’s CNV published General Resolution 1166/2026, replacing Article 3 of Section II, Title XI of the CNV Rules within the PLA/FT/FP control framework. The measure requires CNV-registered obliged subjects to use specified traceable bank-account or CVU transfer routes for receiving and paying client funds and removes cheque use from those payment modalities.

Effective 15.09.2026Open update ↗
10.08.2026
LOCALNew ruleUnidad de Información Financiera (UIF)Real Estate
UIF Resolution 93/2026 establishes risk-based AML/CFT/PF rules for Real Property Registries

Argentina’s UIF published Resolution 93/2026 on 10 August 2026, replacing the prior framework for Real Property Registries with minimum risk-based AML/CFT/PF requirements and revised systematic-reporting rules.

Effective 08.11.2026Open update ↗
14.04.2026
LOCALAmendment
Argentina makes UIF reporting-entity registration fully digital under Resolution 37/2026

UIF Resolution 37/2026 amended Resolution 50/2011 and took effect on Official Gazette publication on 14 April 2026. Reporting entities must attach supporting registration documentation through SRO+, including ownership, management and beneficial-owner materials as applicable. Articles 3 bis, ter and quater are replaced; the regulation also provides administrative working-day deadlines for documentation remediation and updates to registered contact and compliance-officer details.

Effective 14.04.2026Open update ↗
31.03.2026
LOCALNew rule
Argentina adopts UIF Resolution 35/2026 on domestic and cross-border supervisory information exchange

Published on 31 March 2026, UIF Resolution 35/2026 regulates AML/CFT/CPF information exchange among Argentina’s designated financial supervisors (the BCRA, CNV, SSN and INAES) and comparable foreign authorities. It provides use and onward-disclosure safeguards, repeals UIF Resolution 233/2025 and commences on the date of Official Gazette publication under Article 9.

Effective 31.03.2026Open update ↗
08.01.2026
LOCALNew rule
Argentina issues UIF Resolution 3/2026 on proliferation-financing reporting and freezing

UIF Resolution 3/2026, published in Argentina’s Official Gazette on 8 January 2026, establishes operational measures for reporting suspected proliferation financing and administrative freezing of property related to designated persons and entities. Article 8 requires reporting entities notified of a freezing decision to screen their customer base, immobilise applicable assets and report implementation results within 24 hours of notification. Article 12 sets commencement upon Gazette publication.

Effective 08.01.2026Open update ↗
20252 events
18.06.2025
GLOBALGlobal standardPayment transparencyFATFBanking / Credit InstitutionsPayments / EMI / Money Transfer
FATF updates Standards on Recommendation 16 on Payment Transparency

FATF revised Recommendation 16 to standardise payment information and strengthen fraud/error controls in cross-border payments.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member · also GAFILAT

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Published 18.06.2025 · Future-effective global standard · Country implementation is separateOpen update ↗
25.02.2025
GLOBALGlobal standardRisk-based approach / financial inclusionFATF
FATF updates Standards and consults on guidance to better promote financial inclusion

FATF amended Recommendation 1 and related interpretive material to strengthen proportionality and simplified measures under the risk-based approach.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member · also GAFILAT

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 25.02.2025 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
20243 events
15.03.2024
LOCALAmendmentArgentina national legal database
Law No. 27.739 modernises Argentina’s AML/CFT/PF framework

The reform updates Law No. 25.246, strengthens beneficial-owner transparency, expands obliged subjects and establishes the legal basis for regulation and registration of virtual-asset service providers.

Effective 15.03.2024Open update ↗
20232 events
27.10.2023
GLOBALGlobal standardAsset recoveryFATF
FATF strengthens global asset-recovery and confiscation standards

FATF revised Recommendations 4, 30, 31 and 38 and related interpretive material to make asset recovery a stronger operational priority, expand tools to trace and confiscate criminal property and improve domestic and international cooperation.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member · also GAFILAT

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 27.10.2023 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
24.02.2023
GLOBALGlobal standardBeneficial ownershipFATF
FATF strengthens beneficial-ownership transparency for trusts and legal arrangements

At its February 2023 Plenary FATF revised Recommendation 25 and its Interpretive Note to strengthen transparency and beneficial-ownership requirements for trusts and similar legal arrangements, complementing the 2022 strengthening of Recommendation 24 for legal persons.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member · also GAFILAT

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 24.02.2023 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
20221 event
04.03.2022
GLOBALGlobal standardBeneficial ownershipFATF
FATF Recommendation 24 — beneficial ownership of legal persons

FATF strengthened Recommendation 24 on beneficial ownership transparency for legal persons.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member · also GAFILAT

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 04.03.2022 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
20202 events
23.10.2020
GLOBALGlobal standardPFFATF
FATF requires proliferation-financing risk assessment and mitigation

FATF amended Recommendations 1 and 2 and their Interpretive Notes so countries and covered private-sector entities must identify, assess and mitigate risks of breaches, non-implementation or evasion of proliferation-related targeted financial sanctions.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member · also GAFILAT

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 23.10.2020 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
02.07.2020
GLOBALSupervisory standardSupervisory cooperation
Basel Committee strengthens cooperation between prudential and AML/CFT supervisors

The Basel Committee revised its ML/TF risk-management guidelines to add principles for information exchange and cooperation between prudential and AML/CFT supervisors in authorisation, ongoing supervision and enforcement.

COUNTRY APPLICABILITYNon-binding global benchmark

A Basel supervisory publication does not become domestic law merely because it is GLOBAL. National adoption, supervisory use or incorporation must be evidenced by a LOCAL milestone or source.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ↗
Global supervisory benchmark · 02.07.2020 · Domestic adoption is separateOpen update ↗
20191 event
21.06.2019
GLOBALGlobal standardVirtual assets / Travel RuleFATF
FATF adopts the R.15 Interpretive Note and applies the Travel Rule framework to VASPs

FATF adopted detailed implementation requirements for virtual assets and VASPs in June 2019, including the application of wire-transfer information requirements commonly described as the Travel Rule. This operationalised the virtual-asset perimeter introduced through the 2018 Recommendation 15 revision.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member · also GAFILAT

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 21.06.2019 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
20181 event
19.10.2018
GLOBALGlobal standardVirtual assets / VASPsFATF
FATF Recommendation 15 is revised for virtual assets and VASPs

In October 2018 FATF revised Recommendation 15 and added the definitions of virtual asset and virtual asset service provider, formally bringing virtual-asset activity into the global AML/CFT standards architecture. Detailed implementation requirements followed in 2019.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member · also GAFILAT

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 19.10.2018 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
20142 events
15.01.2014
GLOBALSupervisory standardBank supervision
Basel Committee integrates ML/TF risk into banks’ overall risk-management framework

The Basel Committee issued Sound management of risks related to money laundering and financing of terrorism, superseding its 2001 CDD and 2004 consolidated KYC papers and integrating ML/TF risk management with prudential supervisory expectations.

COUNTRY APPLICABILITYNon-binding global benchmark

A Basel supervisory publication does not become domestic law merely because it is GLOBAL. National adoption, supervisory use or incorporation must be evidenced by a LOCAL milestone or source.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ↗
Global supervisory benchmark · 15.01.2014 · Domestic adoption is separateOpen update ↗
20121 event
16.02.2012
GLOBALGlobal standardAML/CFT/CPF standardsFATF
International Standards on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism & Proliferation

FATF adopted a consolidated revised set of 40 Recommendations integrating AML, CFT and proliferation-financing safeguards.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member · also GAFILAT

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 16.02.2012 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
20111 event
20062 events
23.12.2006
GLOBALUNSC · bindingPF / TFS
UN Security Council Resolution 1737 establishes Iran proliferation-related asset-freeze measures

Resolution 1737 imposed binding measures concerning Iran’s proliferation-sensitive nuclear activities, including an asset freeze on designated individuals and entities. Together with the DPRK regime, it forms a foundational UN counter-proliferation targeted-financial-sanctions architecture.

CURRENT CHARTER RELATIONSHIPUN Member State · Article 25 obligation

UN Members agree to accept and carry out Security Council decisions. This current Charter relationship is not proof of the jurisdiction’s domestic implementation, nor a claim about its membership status on the historical event date.

UN Charter · Article 25 ↗
Binding UNSC architecture · 23.12.2006 · National implementation is separateOpen update ↗
14.10.2006
GLOBALUNSC · bindingPF / TFS
UN Security Council Resolution 1718 establishes DPRK proliferation-related asset-freeze measures

Following the DPRK nuclear test, Resolution 1718 imposed binding sanctions including an asset freeze on designated persons and entities connected to the nuclear programme. It became a central UN targeted-financial-sanctions pillar for counter-proliferation financing.

CURRENT CHARTER RELATIONSHIPUN Member State · Article 25 obligation

UN Members agree to accept and carry out Security Council decisions. This current Charter relationship is not proof of the jurisdiction’s domestic implementation, nor a claim about its membership status on the historical event date.

UN Charter · Article 25 ↗
Binding UNSC architecture · 14.10.2006 · National implementation is separateOpen update ↗
20042 events
2004-10
GLOBALGlobal standardCFT / cash couriersFATF
FATF Ninth Special Recommendation

FATF added a ninth Special Recommendation addressing cash couriers and cross-border movement of currency.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member · also GAFILAT

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 2004-10 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
28.04.2004
GLOBALUNSC · bindingPF / WMD controls
UN Security Council Resolution 1540 creates binding global WMD-proliferation control duties

Resolution 1540 requires all States to adopt and enforce laws and domestic controls to prevent non-State actors from acquiring or using weapons of mass destruction and related materials. It forms a binding global legal pillar of the proliferation-financing control environment later reflected in FATF CPF standards.

CURRENT CHARTER RELATIONSHIPUN Member State · Article 25 obligation

UN Members agree to accept and carry out Security Council decisions. This current Charter relationship is not proof of the jurisdiction’s domestic implementation, nor a claim about its membership status on the historical event date.

UN Charter · Article 25 ↗
Binding UNSC architecture · 28.04.2004 · National implementation is separateOpen update ↗
20033 events
31.10.2003
GLOBALTreatyML / asset recovery
UNCAC adds a universal anti-corruption, laundering and asset-recovery treaty layer

The UN General Assembly adopted the United Nations Convention against Corruption on 31 October 2003. UNCAC addresses prevention of money laundering, laundering of corruption proceeds, confiscation and a dedicated asset-recovery framework; the Convention entered into force globally on 14 December 2005.

CURRENT TREATY STATUSParty

Current UN depositary relationship to 2003 UN Convention against Corruption. This is not a claim that the jurisdiction was already a Party on the GLOBAL event date; the national accession/ratification date is a separate LOCAL/STATUS fact.

UN Treaty Collection ↗
Treaty adopted 31.10.2003 · Global entry into force 14.12.2005 · Country treaty status is separateOpen update ↗
2003-06
GLOBALGlobal standardAML/CFT standardsFATF
The FATF Recommendations — 2003 revision

FATF comprehensively revised its AML/CFT Recommendations, strengthening preventive measures and extending coverage.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member · also GAFILAT

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 2003-06 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
20013 events
04.10.2001
GLOBALSupervisory standardCDD / KYC
Basel Committee establishes a global customer-due-diligence benchmark for banks

The Basel Committee issued Customer due diligence for banks, setting minimum supervisory expectations for customer acceptance, identification, ongoing monitoring and risk management. It became an influential global banking KYC/CDD benchmark and was later reflected in FATF standards.

COUNTRY APPLICABILITYNon-binding global benchmark

A Basel supervisory publication does not become domestic law merely because it is GLOBAL. National adoption, supervisory use or incorporation must be evidenced by a LOCAL milestone or source.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ↗
Global supervisory benchmark · 04.10.2001 · Domestic adoption is separateOpen update ↗
2001-10
GLOBALGlobal standardCFTFATF
FATF Special Recommendations on Terrorist Financing

FATF expanded its standards to terrorist financing through eight Special Recommendations.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member · also GAFILAT

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 2001-10 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
28.09.2001
GLOBALUNSC · bindingCFT / TFS
UN Security Council Resolution 1373 imposes binding CFT and freezing duties on all States

Resolution 1373 requires all States to prevent and suppress terrorist financing, criminalise the provision or collection of funds for terrorist acts, freeze terrorist assets without delay and prohibit making funds or financial services available to terrorists and related entities.

CURRENT CHARTER RELATIONSHIPUN Member State · Article 25 obligation

UN Members agree to accept and carry out Security Council decisions. This current Charter relationship is not proof of the jurisdiction’s domestic implementation, nor a claim about its membership status on the historical event date.

UN Charter · Article 25 ↗
Binding UNSC architecture · 28.09.2001 · National implementation is separateOpen update ↗
20004 events
15.11.2000
GLOBALTreatyML / organised crime
Palermo Convention broadens the international money-laundering framework beyond drug trafficking

The Palermo Convention was adopted on 15 November 2000 and broadened the international money-laundering framework beyond drug proceeds through criminalisation and preventive measures tied to transnational organised crime. It entered into force globally on 29 September 2003.

CURRENT TREATY STATUSParty

Current UN depositary relationship to 2000 Palermo Convention. This is not a claim that the jurisdiction was already a Party on the GLOBAL event date; the national accession/ratification date is a separate LOCAL/STATUS fact.

UN Treaty Collection ↗
Treaty adopted 15.11.2000 · Global entry into force 29.09.2003 · Country treaty status is separateOpen update ↗
10.05.2000
LOCALNew ruleArgentina national legal database / UIF
Argentina establishes national AML framework through Law No. 25.246

Law No. 25.246 creates UIF, establishes laundering prevention and reporting duties, and forms the statutory backbone of Argentina’s AML regime.

Effective 10.05.2000Open update ↗
19992 events
09.12.1999
GLOBALTreatyCFT
UN Terrorist Financing Convention establishes a treaty-level CFT framework

The UN General Assembly adopted the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism on 9 December 1999, creating the treaty framework for criminalising terrorist financing and international cooperation. It entered into force globally on 10 April 2002.

CURRENT TREATY STATUSParty

Current UN depositary relationship to 1999 Terrorist Financing Convention. This is not a claim that the jurisdiction was already a Party on the GLOBAL event date; the national accession/ratification date is a separate LOCAL/STATUS fact.

UN Treaty Collection ↗
Treaty adopted 09.12.1999 · Global entry into force 10.04.2002 · Country treaty status is separateOpen update ↗
15.10.1999
GLOBALUNSC · bindingTFS
UN Security Council Resolution 1267 establishes a targeted asset-freeze regime

Resolution 1267 imposed an assets freeze and other targeted sanctions in the Taliban context and created the Security Council committee that became the foundation of the UN 1267 sanctions architecture. It is a key global precursor to modern terrorist-financing targeted financial sanctions.

CURRENT CHARTER RELATIONSHIPUN Member State · Article 25 obligation

UN Members agree to accept and carry out Security Council decisions. This current Charter relationship is not proof of the jurisdiction’s domestic implementation, nor a claim about its membership status on the historical event date.

UN Charter · Article 25 ↗
Binding UNSC architecture · 15.10.1999 · National implementation is separateOpen update ↗
19961 event
1996
GLOBALGlobal standardAML standardsFATF
The FATF Recommendations — 1996 revision

FATF revised the Forty Recommendations to reflect evolving money-laundering methods and countermeasures.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member · also GAFILAT

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 1996 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
19951 event
09.06.1995
GLOBALFIU cooperationFIU cooperation
Egmont Group creates the global FIU cooperation network

Representatives of 13 financial intelligence units met in Brussels on 9 June 1995 and founded what became the Egmont Group. The milestone created the operational global network for FIU-to-FIU cooperation and exchange of financial intelligence.

CURRENT EGMONT RELATIONSHIPMember FIU · UIF-AR

Current profile relationship to the Egmont network. This does not imply membership in 1995; admission history is a separate LOCAL/STATUS fact.

Egmont Group · Member FIUs ↗
Global FIU cooperation infrastructure · 09.06.1995 · FIU membership is separateOpen update ↗
19901 event
1990
GLOBALGlobal standardAML standardsFATF
The Forty Recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering

FATF issued its original Forty Recommendations, establishing the first global AML standard framework.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member · also GAFILAT

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global standard · 1990 · Country implementation/status is separateOpen update ↗
19891 event
1989
GLOBALGlobal institutionGlobal standard-settingFATF
Financial Action Task Force is established by the G7

The G7 established FATF in 1989 to examine and develop measures to combat money laundering. FATF became the central global standard-setting body whose recommendations are implemented through national and regional AML/CFT frameworks.

CURRENT FATF RELATIONSHIPDirect FATF member · also GAFILAT

Current relationship. Direct FATF membership and any listed regional assessment network participation are current profile relationships only. The GLOBAL milestone does not prove membership or domestic implementation on the event date; those remain LOCAL/STATUS evidence.

FATF Global Network ↗
Global institutional milestone · 1989 · Country membership is separateOpen update ↗
19882 events
20.12.1988
GLOBALTreatyML criminalisation
Vienna Convention creates the first treaty-level international money-laundering criminalisation baseline

The Vienna Convention was adopted on 20 December 1988 and created the first treaty-level international obligation to criminalise laundering conduct linked to drug-trafficking proceeds, alongside confiscation and international-cooperation measures. It entered into force globally on 11 November 1990.

CURRENT TREATY STATUSParty

Current UN depositary relationship to 1988 Vienna Convention. This is not a claim that the jurisdiction was already a Party on the GLOBAL event date; the national accession/ratification date is a separate LOCAL/STATUS fact.

UN Treaty Collection ↗
Treaty adopted 20.12.1988 · Global entry into force 11.11.1990 · Country treaty status is separateOpen update ↗
1988-12
GLOBALSupervisory standardBank AML / KYC
Basel Committee issues principles to prevent criminal use of banks for money laundering

The Basel Committee published a Statement of Principles for banks aimed at reducing the risk that banking institutions would be used by criminals or as channels for money laundering. This helped establish the preventive and supervisory side of AML alongside the emerging criminal-law framework.

COUNTRY APPLICABILITYNon-binding global benchmark

A Basel supervisory publication does not become domestic law merely because it is GLOBAL. National adoption, supervisory use or incorporation must be evidenced by a LOCAL milestone or source.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ↗
Global supervisory benchmark · 1988-12 · Domestic adoption is separateOpen update ↗

Sources & Verification23

Law No. 25.246 — current AML/CFT frameworkArgentina National Legal Database · LAW / REGULATIONLaw No. 27.739 — 2024 AML/CFT/PF and PSAV reformArgentina National Legal Database · LAW / REGULATIONUIF Resolution 49/2024 — PSAV AML/CFT/PF requirementsUnidad de Información Financiera (UIF) · LAW / REGULATIONCNV General Resolution 994/2024 — PSAV registerComisión Nacional de Valores (CNV) · REGISTER / DATAArgentina · FATF country profileFinancial Action Task Force (FATF) · ASSESSMENT / PROFILEUIF national risk assessment and national strategy publicationsUnidad de Información Financiera (UIF) · ASSESSMENT / PROFILEUIF PSAV reporting guidanceUnidad de Información Financiera (UIF) · GUIDANCEResolución General 1166/2026Comisión Nacional de Valores (CNV) · LAW / REGULATIONUIF Resolution 3/2026 — Reporting proliferation financing and administrative asset freezingUnidad de Información Financiera (UIF), Argentina · LAW / REGULATIONUIF Resolution 35/2026 — AML/CFT/CPF supervisory information exchangeUnidad de Información Financiera (UIF), Argentina · LAW / REGULATIONUIF Resolution 37/2026 — Digital registration of reporting entities through SRO+Unidad de Información Financiera (UIF), Argentina · LAW / REGULATIONFATF RecommendationsFinancial Action Task Force (FATF) · OFFICIAL SOURCEFATF Countries & Global NetworkFinancial Action Task Force (FATF) · OFFICIAL SOURCEFinancial Action Task Force of Latin AmericaFinancial Action Task Force (FATF) · OFFICIAL SOURCEEgmont Group Member FIU InformationEgmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units · INSTITUTIONAL / REFERENCEFATF consolidated assessment ratingsTechnical Compliance & Effectiveness · 2013 MethodologyMutual Evaluation Report · 2024-12Official FATF / regional assessmentUIF · Reporting FAQUnidad de Información Financiera (UIF) · GUIDANCEUIF Resolution 56/2024Argentina National Legal Database · OFFICIAL SOURCEUIF · Reporte Sistemático Mensual (RSM)Unidad de Información Financiera (UIF) · OFFICIAL SOURCEUIF · resolutions for obliged entitiesUnidad de Información Financiera (UIF) · OFFICIAL SOURCEUIF · resolutions directoryUnidad de Información Financiera (UIF) · OFFICIAL SOURCEUIF Resolution 93/2026 — minimum AML/CFT/PF requirements for Real Property RegistriesUnidad de Información Financiera (UIF) · LAW / REGULATION