National Risk Assessment Source Map

A National Risk Assessment (NRA) is a country's structured assessment of money laundering and terrorist financing risks. It helps explain sectoral risks, threat patterns, vulnerabilities and control priorities.

1. Why NRAs matter #

NRAs are useful because they show how a country understands its own risk landscape. They can inform sector risk, geographic risk, product risk and customer-risk context.

2. What to look for #

NRA section AML relevance
Threat assessment Main predicate crimes and typologies
Vulnerability assessment Weaknesses in sectors, supervision or data availability
Sector risk Banks, PSPs, VASPs, DNFBPs, real estate, legal services, casinos and others
Geographic and cross-border risk External exposure and regional flows
Mitigation priorities Where controls are being strengthened

3. Evidence use #

Use NRA findings as context, not as a final customer decision. A customer still needs individual CDD, KYB, UBO, sanctions, PEP and adverse media assessment.

4. Limitations #

NRAs vary in quality, age, public detail and methodology. Some are not public. They may also be politically sensitive or too high-level for a specific customer decision.

5. Source basis #

Egmont and comparative context#

Egmont's report on the role of FIUs in the National Risk Assessment process (SRC-EGMONT-NRA-001) adds operational context on FIU data, coordination, stakeholder participation and implementation of NRA findings.

The Basel AML Index (SRC-BASEL-INDEX-001) may be used as an external comparative indicator, but it is not an NRA and must not replace the country's own risk assessment or FATF findings.

A strong source note separates:

  1. national assessment;
  2. FATF evaluation and list status;
  3. FIU operational context;
  4. independent comparative indices;
  5. institution-specific exposure.

References#

  • FATF methods-and-trends publications and mutual-evaluation methodology concepts listed in the Source Register.
  • FIU/regulator public advisories and typology indicators where applicable.
  • Defensive typology boundary in the Editorial & Source Policy.